Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37781148›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2023

Creativity at rest: Exploring functional network connectivity of creative experts.

William Orwig, Roni Setton, Ibai Diez, Elisenda Bueichekú, Meghan L Meyer, Diana I Tamir, Jorge Sepulcre, Daniel L Schacter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

William OrwigDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9913-6391
Roni SettonDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8829-364X
Ibai DiezGordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5769-0178
Elisenda BueichekúGordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3059-9806
Meghan L MeyerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9834-5925
Diana I TamirDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4290-4820
Jorge SepulcreGordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4199-2304
Daniel L SchacterDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2460-6061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neuroscience of creativity seeks to disentangle the complex brain processes that underpin the generation of novel ideas. Neuroimaging studies of functional connectivity, particularly functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), have revealed individual differences in brain network organization associated with creative ability; however, much of the extant research is limited to laboratory-based divergent thinking measures. To overcome these limitations, we compare functional brain connectivity in a cohort of creative experts (

Indexed as

CreativityDistal simulationfMRIFunctional connectivityVividness

Identifiers

PMID37781148
PMCPMC10473280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.