Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37780981›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2023

Examining Letter Detector Tolerance through Offset Letter Halves: Evidence from Lexical Decision.

Manuel Perea, Inka Romero-Ortells, Melanie Labusch, María Fernández-López, Ana Marcet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manuel PereaDepartment of Methodology and ERI-Lectura, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3291-1365
Inka Romero-OrtellsCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3888-6129
Melanie LabuschDepartment of Methodology and ERI-Lectura, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5556-4685
María Fernández-LópezDepartment of Basic Psychology, Methodology, and ERI-Lectura, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7419-7369
Ana MarcetGrupo de Investigación en Enseñanza de Lenguas (GIEL), Department of Language and Literature Teaching, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8755-5903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurobiological models of reading assume that the specialized detectors at the letter level (e.g., the arrays of detectors for the letter 'n') possess a certain degree of tolerance (e.g., Local Combination Detectors model, Dehaene et al. 2005). In this study, we designed two lexical decision experiments that examined the limits of tolerance of letter detectors by introducing a novel manipulation involving shifting letter halves (e.g., in Experiment 1; in Experiment 2) relative to intact items. This manipulation alters the transition between upper and lower parts of the letters, adding junctions that do not exist in the intact letter forms. We included high- and low-frequency words in the stimulus list to investigate whether letter distortion affects processing beyond the letter level, reasoning that interactive effects would signal top-down lexical feedback. In Experiment 1, which employed a subtle letter shift, we observed a minimal cost of letter distortion that did not interact with word frequency. Experiment 2, employing a larger letter shift, revealed an overall greater reading cost that affected differentially high- and low-frequency words. Overall, these findings offer insights into the limits of resilience in letter detectors to distortion during word recognition and introduce a novel manipulation of letter distortion.

Indexed as

letter distortionlexical accesslexical decisionword recognition

Identifiers

PMID37780981
PMCPMC10540705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.