ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2023
Evaluation of consciousness rehabilitation via neuroimaging methods.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immediate large-scale cortical network changes following acupuncture in patients with disorders of consciousness: a resting-state fNIRS study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neuroimaging and consciousness: applications of PET, SPECT, and advanced MRI modalities.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
- Motor Intention Quantization for Patients With Disorders of Consciousness by Multimodal BCI Combining Electroencephalography and Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Reliability and Validity of the Lowenstein Communication Scale.Neurology international · 2025Article
- The immediate effect of acupuncture on brain function in patients with chronic itch: a study protocol for an fNIRS investigation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Functional near-infrared spectroscopy for the assessment and treatment of patients with disorders of consciousness.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Assessment of residual awareness in patients with disorders of consciousness using functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based connectivity: a pilot study.Neurophotonics · 2024Article
- Impacts of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation parameters on cerebral hemodynamics in patients with disorders of consciousness.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate evaluation of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) is crucial for personalized treatment. However, misdiagnosis remains a serious issue. Neuroimaging methods could observe the conscious activity in patients who have no evidence of consciousness in behavior, and provide objective and quantitative indexes to assist doctors in their diagnosis. In the review, we discussed the current research based on the evaluation of consciousness rehabilitation after DoC using EEG, fMRI, PET, and fNIRS, as well as the advantages and limitations of each method. Nowadays single-modal neuroimaging can no longer meet the researchers` demand. Considering both spatial and temporal resolution, recent studies have attempted to focus on the multi-modal method which can enhance the capability of neuroimaging methods in the evaluation of DoC. As neuroimaging devices become wireless, integrated, and portable, multi-modal neuroimaging methods will drive new advancements in brain science research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.