Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37780957›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023

An F-ratio-based method for estimating the number of active sources in MEG.

Amita Giri, John C Mosher, Amir Adler, Dimitrios Pantazis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation and Characterization of High-Uniformity SiNMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Localization of Realistic Spatial Patches of Complex Source Activity in MEG and EEG.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amita GiriMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
John C MosherDepartment of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, Texas Institute for Restorative Neurotechnologies, UTHealth, Houston, TX, United States.
Amir AdlerMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Dimitrios PantazisMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
McGovern Institute for Brain Research · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Digital Biomarkers for Vascular Cognitive Decline in Patients with Minor StrokeRF1AG079324 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARSH, ELISABETH BREESE, MOSHER, JOHN COMPTON · 2022 to 2025
$3.8M
Digital biomarker for a low cost ambulatory test for early detection of Alzheimer's diseaseRF1AG074204 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI FUNKE, MICHAEL, MOSHER, JOHN COMPTON · 2021 to 2021
$2.1M
CRCNS: Resolving human face perception with novel MEG source localization methodsR01EY033638 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PANTAZIS, DIMITRIOS · 2021 to 2023
$727k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033638NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG074204NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG079324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a powerful technique for studying the human brain function. However, accurately estimating the number of sources that contribute to the MEG recordings remains a challenging problem due to the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the presence of correlated sources, inaccuracies in head modeling, and variations in individual anatomy. Methods: To address these issues, our study introduces a robust method for accurately estimating the number of active sources in the brain based on the F-ratio statistical approach, which allows for a comparison between a full model with a higher number of sources and a reduced model with fewer sources. Using this approach, we developed a formal statistical procedure that sequentially increases the number of sources in the multiple dipole localization problem until all sources are found. Results: Our results revealed that the selection of thresholds plays a critical role in determining the method's overall performance, and appropriate thresholds needed to be adjusted for the number of sources and SNR levels, while they remained largely invariant to different inter-source correlations, translational modeling inaccuracies, and different cortical anatomies. By identifying optimal thresholds and validating our F-ratio-based method in simulated, real phantom, and human MEG data, we demonstrated the superiority of our F-ratio-based method over existing state-of-the-art statistical approaches, such as the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Minimum Description Length (MDL). Discussion: Overall, when tuned for optimal selection of thresholds, our method offers researchers a precise tool to estimate the true number of active brain sources and accurately model brain function.

Indexed as

AICAlternating Projection (AP)F-ratioMDLMEGsource enumerationsource localization

Identifiers

PMID37780957
PMCPMC10537939
OpenAlexW4380357909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.