Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37780956›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2021

Knowledge, attitudes and practices relating to antibiotic use and resistance among prescribers from public primary healthcare facilities in Harare, Zimbabwe.

Ioana D Olaru, Rashida A Ferrand, Shunmay Yeung, Rudo Chingono, Prosper Chonzi, Kudzai P E Masunda, Justin Dixon, Katharina Kranzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ioana D OlaruDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3392-9257
Rashida A FerrandDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7660-9176
Shunmay YeungDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Rudo ChingonoBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7061-7861
Prosper ChonziDepartment of Health, Harare City Council, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Kudzai P E MasundaDepartment of Health, Harare City Council, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Justin DixonDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9659-7926
Katharina KranzerDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Overuse of antibiotics is one of the main drivers for antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Globally, most antibiotics are prescribed in the outpatient setting. This survey aimed to explore attitudes and practices with regards to microbiology tests, AMR and antibiotic prescribing among healthcare providers at public primary health clinics in Harare, Zimbabwe. Methods This cross-sectional survey was conducted in nine primary health clinics located in low-income suburbs of Harare between October and December 2020. In Zimbabwe, primary health clinics provide nurse-led outpatient care for acute and chronic illnesses. Healthcare providers who independently prescribe antibiotics and order diagnostic tests were invited to participate. The survey used self-administered questionnaires. A five-point Likert scale was used to determine attitudes and beliefs. Results A total of 91 healthcare providers agreed to participate in the survey. The majority of participants (62/91, 68%) had more than 10 years of work experience. Most participants reported that they consider AMR as a global (75/91, 82%) and/or national (81/91, 89%) problem, while 52/91 (57%) considered AMR to be a problem in their healthcare facilities. A fifth of participants (20/91, 22%) were unsure if AMR was a problem in their clinics. Participants felt that availability of national guidelines (89/89, 100%), training sessions on antibiotic prescribing (89/89, 100%) and regular audit and feedback on prescribing (82/88, 93%) were helpful interventions to improve prescribing. Conclusions These findings support the need for increased availability of data on AMR and antibiotic use in primary care. Educational interventions, regular audit and feedback, and access to practice guidelines may be useful to limit overuse of antibiotics.

Indexed as

AMRantibiotic resistanceantibiotic useoutpatients

Identifiers

PMID37780956
PMCPMC10534082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.