ArticleJOR spine2023
Deep learning-based detection and classification of lumbar disc herniation on magnetic resonance images.
Article in JOR spine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning for the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation After Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Automated detection of lumbar disc herniation at L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels on sagittal MRI using a YOLO-based deep learning model.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Article
- Application and performance of deep learning models for the automated diagnosis of cervical central spinal stenosis on MRI: a systematic review.Brain & spine · 2026Review
- Intelligence Architectures and Machine Learning Applications in Contemporary Spine Care.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Quantification and classification of lumbar disc herniation on axial magnetic resonance images using deep learning models.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- Integrating multidimensional data analytics for precision diagnosis of chronic low back pain.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automated diagnosis and grading of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration based on a modified YOLO framework.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Application and Prospects of Deep Learning Technology in Fracture Diagnosis.Current medical science · 2024Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Spine MRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence: a new cutting-edge tool in spine surgery.Asian spine journal · 2024Article
- Deep-Learning-Based Radiomics to Predict Surgical Risk Factors for Lumbar Disc Herniation in Young Patients: A Multicenter Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based detection and classification of lumbar disc herniation on magnetic resonance images.JOR spine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The severity assessment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) on MR images is crucial for selecting suitable surgical candidates. However, the interpretation of MR images is time-consuming and requires repetitive work. This study aims to develop and evaluate a deep learning-based diagnostic model for automated LDH detection and classification on lumbar axial T2-weighted MR images. Methods: A total of 1115 patients were analyzed in this retrospective study; both a development dataset (1015 patients, 15 249 images) and an external test dataset (100 patients, 1273 images) were utilized. According to the Michigan State University (MSU) classification criterion, experts labeled all images with consensus, and the final labeled results were regarded as the reference standard. The automated diagnostic model comprised Faster R-CNN and ResNeXt101 as the detection and classification network, respectively. The deep learning-based diagnostic performance was evaluated by calculating mean intersection over union (IoU), accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: High detection consistency was obtained in the internal test dataset (mean IoU = 0.82, precision = 98.4%, sensitivity = 99.4%) and external test dataset (mean IoU = 0.70, precision = 96.3%, sensitivity = 97.8%). Overall accuracy for LDH classification was 87.70% (95% CI: 86.59%-88.86%) and 74.23% (95% CI: 71.83%-76.75%) in the internal and external test datasets, respectively. For internal testing, the proposed model achieved a high agreement in classification (ICC = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.86-0.88, Conclusions: The automated diagnostic model achieved high performance in detecting and classifying LDH and exhibited considerable consistency with experts' classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.