Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37780707›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Effect of vagus nerve stimulation against generalized seizure and status epilepticus recurrence.

Yasushi Iimura, Hiroharu Suzuki, Takumi Mitsuhashi, Tetsuya Ueda, Kazuki Nishioka, Kou Horikoshi, Kazuki Nomura, Hidenori Sugano, Akihide Kondo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulator during transition to adulthood in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yasushi IimuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroharu SuzukiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takumi MitsuhashiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuya UedaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuki NishiokaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kou HorikoshiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuki NomuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidenori SuganoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihide KondoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Juntendo University · JPJuntendo University Hospital · JPMinamiaoyama Eye Clinic · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a palliative surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy. The two objectives of this study were to (1) determine the seizure type most responsive to VNS and (2) investigate the preventive effect on status epilepticus (SE) recurrence. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 136 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent VNS implantation. We examined seizure outcomes at 6, 12, and 24 months following implantation of VNS as well as at the last visit to the Juntendo Epilepsy Center. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the prognostic factors. Results: 125 patients were followed up for at least 1 year after VNS implantation. The percentage of patients with at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency compared with prior to VNS implantation increased over time at 6, 12, and 24 months after VNS implantation: 28, 41, and 52%, respectively. Regarding overall seizure outcomes, 70 (56%) patients responded to VNS. Of the 40 patients with a history of SE prior to VNS implantation, 27 (67%) showed no recurrence of SE. The duration of epilepsy, history of SE prior to VNS implantation and seizure type were correlated with seizure outcomes after VNS implantation in univariate analysis ( Conclusion: Following 125 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy for an average of 69 months, 56% showed at least 50% reduction in seizure frequency after VNS implantation. This study suggests that generalized seizure is the most responsive to VNS, and that VNS may reduce the risk of recurrence of SE. VNS was shown to be effective against generalized seizure and also may potentially influence the risk of further events of SE, two marker of disease treatment that can lead to improved quality of life.

Indexed as

drug-resistant epilepsygeneralized seizureresponse ratestatus epilepticusvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID37780707
PMCPMC10540227
OpenAlexW4386771801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.