Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37780676›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2023

Anesthesia for office-based facial plastic surgery procedures.

Suhas Bharadwaj, William Dougherty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Suzetrigine: What Should Plastic Surgeons Know?Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Outcomes following inguinal and subinguinal urologic procedures under deep intravenous sedation.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  11. Anesthesia for office-based facial plastic surgery procedures.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suhas BharadwajDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Eastern Virginia Medical School Norfolk Virginia USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6757-8905
William DoughertyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Eastern Virginia Medical School Norfolk Virginia USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to provide a state-of-the-art review on the use of anesthetics for in-office facial plastic procedures. Methods: A search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Review using the keywords "anesthesia," "office-based procedures," "local anesthesia," "facial plastics," "oral sedation," "moderate sedation," and "deep sedation." Results and Conclusions: Over the past few decades, the shift toward in-office invasive procedures has increased patient convenience and decreased hospital resource utilization. Many tools exist to reduce patient anxiety and discomfort in an office-based setting. With proper patient selection and technique, facial plastic surgeons can adequately anesthetize patients to perform Mohs reconstruction, cutaneous excisions, blepharoplasty, face-lifts, and other in-office procedures.

Indexed as

anesthesiafacial plastic surgeryoffice‐based procedures

Identifiers

PMID37780676
PMCPMC10541158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.