Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37780636›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2023

A comparative analysis of the cost-utility of the Philippine tax on sweetened beverages as proposed and as implemented.

Oliver Huse, Kathryn Backholer, Phuong Nguyen, Anthony Calibo, Mildred Guirindola, Josie P Desnacido, Gary Sacks, Andrew Colin Bell, Anna Peeters, Imelda Angeles-Agdeppa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How Filipinos View Obesity: Findings From the ACTION APAC Study.Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Oliver HuseGlobal Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Kathryn BackholerGlobal Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Phuong NguyenGlobal Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Anthony CaliboChild Health Division, Department of Health, Medical Specialist IV, Disease Prevention and Control Bureau, Manila (2011-2020), Philippines.
Mildred GuirindolaDepartment of Science and Technology, Food and Nutrition Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.
Josie P DesnacidoDepartment of Science and Technology, Food and Nutrition Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.
Gary SacksGlobal Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Andrew Colin BellGlobal Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Anna PeetersGlobal Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Imelda Angeles-AgdeppaDepartment of Science and Technology, Food and Nutrition Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.
Jaithri AnanthapavanGlobal Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Deakin University · AUNutrition Center of the Philippines · PHDepartment of Health · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In response to increasing overweight and obesity, the Philippine government introduced a tax on sweetened beverages (SBs) in 2018. Evidence suggests that the beverage industry influenced the final tax design, making it more favourable for industry than the initially proposed bill. This study aimed to compare the relative health and economic benefits of the proposed SB tax with the implemented SB tax. Methods: Philippine dietary consumption data were combined with price elasticity data from Mexico and data from Australia adapted to the Philippine context to estimate reductions in SB purchases and changes in body mass index (BMI) following the implementation of the tax. A multi-state, multiple-cohort Markov model was used to estimate the change in health-adjusted life years (HALYs) due to reduction in the epidemiology of obesity-related diseases, healthcare cost savings and government taxation revenue, resulting from both the proposed and implemented tax policies, over the lifetime of the 2018 Philippine population. Findings: The proposed and implemented taxes were modelled to be dominant (cost-saving and improving health). Intervention costs were modelled to be PHP305.2 million (M) (approximately US$6M). Compared to the proposed tax, the implemented tax was modelled to result in a 43.0% smaller reduction in targeted beverage intake (51.1 ml/person/day vs. 89.7 ml/person/day), a 43.5% smaller reduction in BMI (0.35 kg/m Interpretation: While the implemented tax in the Philippines will benefit population health, it is likely to yield less benefit than the proposed tax. The influence of the food and beverage industry on policy processes has the potential to lessen the benefits of population NCD prevention policies. Funding: OH was supported to conduct this research by an Australian Government Research Training Program Stipend Scholarship. The funding body had no role in data collection and analysis, or manuscript preparation.

Indexed as

Corporate political activityCost-utilityObesity preventionPhilippinesPublic health policySugar sweetened beveragesTaxation

Identifiers

PMID37780636
PMCPMC10534259
OpenAlexW4387112950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.