Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37780621›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

A multicenter study on the application of artificial intelligence radiological characteristics to predict prognosis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Jian Hou, Xiangyang Wen, Genyi Qu, Wenwen Chen, Xiang Xu, Guoqing Wu, Ruidong Ji, Genggeng Wei, Tuo Liang, Wenyan Huang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. New Technology in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Application of Navigation System, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, and Suction Access Sheath.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jian HouDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China.
Xiangyang WenDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China.
Genyi QuDepartment of Urology, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Zhuzhou, China.
Wenwen ChenDepartment of Radiology, Zixing First People's Hospital, Chenzhou, China.
Xiang XuDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China.
Guoqing WuDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China.
Ruidong JiDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China.
Genggeng WeiDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China.
Tuo LiangDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China.
Wenyan HuangDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China.
Lin XiongDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hongkong-Shenzhen Hosipital, ShenZhen, China.
University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital · CNChenzhou First People's Hospital · CNZhuzhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A model to predict preoperative outcomes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with renal staghorn stones is developed to be an essential preoperative consultation tool. Objective: In this study, we constructed a predictive model for one-time stone clearance after PCNL for renal staghorn calculi, so as to predict the stone clearance rate of patients in one operation, and provide a reference direction for patients and clinicians. Methods: According to the 175 patients with renal staghorn stones undergoing PCNL at two centers, preoperative/postoperative variables were collected. After identifying characteristic variables using PCA analysis to avoid overfitting. A predictive model was developed for preoperative outcomes after PCNL in patients with renal staghorn stones. In addition, we repeatedly cross-validated their model's predictive efficacy and clinical application using data from two different centers. Results: The study included 175 patients from two centers treated with PCNL. We used a training set and an external validation set. Radionics characteristics, deep migration learning, clinical characteristics, and DTL+Rad-signature were successfully constructed using machine learning based on patients' pre/postoperative imaging characteristics and clinical variables using minimum absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithms. In this study, DTL-Rad signal was found to be the outstanding predictor of stone clearance in patients with renal deer antler-like stones treated by PCNL. The DTL+Rad signature showed good discriminatory ability in both the training and external validation groups with AUC values of 0.871 (95% CI, 0.800-0.942) and 0.744 (95% CI, 0.617-0.871). The decision curve demonstrated the radiographic model's clinical utility and illustrated specificities of 0.935 and 0.806, respectively. Conclusion: We found a prediction model combining imaging characteristics, neural networks, and clinical characteristics can be used as an effective preoperative prediction method.

Indexed as

DeerKidney CalculiNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousNephrostomy, PercutaneousAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceHumansPrognosisartificial intelligenceclinical-radionics modeldecision support systempercutaneous nephrolithotomyrenal staghorn stones

Identifiers

PMID37780621
PMCPMC10541026
OpenAlexW4386836599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.