SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2023
Risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pre-Fracture Cognitive Assessment Using the DASC-21 and Postoperative Delirium Risk.Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2026Article
- Development and multicenter validation of a dynamic nomogram for early postoperative neurocognitive disorder in older adults with hip fracture.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Construction and internal validation of a machine learning model for predicting 30-day readmission after hip surgery.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The association between peripheral nerve blocks and postoperative delirium in adults undergoing hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2025Review
- Establishment of predictive models for postoperative delirium in elderly patients after knee/hip surgery based on total bilirubin concentration: machine learning algorithms.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Developing a nomogram for postoperative delirium in elderly patients with hip fractures.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Advancing Delirium Treatment Trials in Older Adults: Recommendations for Future Trials From the Network for Investigation of Delirium: Unifying Scientists (NIDUS).Critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Random forest predictive modeling of prolonged hospital length of stay in elderly hip fracture patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To systematically evaluate the risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients. Methods: Risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients were collected from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Ovid via the internet, covering studies from the establishment of the databases to March 15, 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and used Stata 13.0 for meta-analysis of predictive factors and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) to evaluate the risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients, evaluated the predictive performance. Results: This analysis included eight studies. Six studies used internal validation to assess the predictive models, while one combined both internal and external validation. The Area Under Curve (AUC) for the models ranged from 0.67 to 0.79. The most common predictors were preoperative dementia or dementia history (OR = 3.123, 95% CI 2.108-4.626, Conclusion: Research on the risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients is still in the developmental stage. The predictive performance of some of the established models achieve expectation and the applicable risk of all models is low, but there are also problems such as high risk of bias and lack of external validation. Medical professionals should select existing models and validate and optimize them with large samples from multiple centers according to their actual situation. It is more recommended to carry out a large sample of prospective studies to build prediction models. Systematic review registration: The protocol for this systematic review was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registered number CRD42022365258.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.