Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37780558›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2023

Risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture: a systematic review.

Yaqi Hua, Yi Yuan, Xin Wang, Liping Liu, Jianting Zhu, Dongying Li, Ping Tu

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pre-Fracture Cognitive Assessment Using the DASC-21 and Postoperative Delirium Risk.Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yaqi HuaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Yi YuanSchool of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Xin WangSchool of Nursing, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Liping LiuSchool of Nursing, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Jianting ZhuSchool of Nursing, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Dongying LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Ping TuDepartment of Postanesthesia Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Nanchang University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CNUniversity of South China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically evaluate the risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients. Methods: Risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients were collected from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Ovid via the internet, covering studies from the establishment of the databases to March 15, 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and used Stata 13.0 for meta-analysis of predictive factors and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) to evaluate the risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients, evaluated the predictive performance. Results: This analysis included eight studies. Six studies used internal validation to assess the predictive models, while one combined both internal and external validation. The Area Under Curve (AUC) for the models ranged from 0.67 to 0.79. The most common predictors were preoperative dementia or dementia history (OR = 3.123, 95% CI 2.108-4.626, Conclusion: Research on the risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients is still in the developmental stage. The predictive performance of some of the established models achieve expectation and the applicable risk of all models is low, but there are also problems such as high risk of bias and lack of external validation. Medical professionals should select existing models and validate and optimize them with large samples from multiple centers according to their actual situation. It is more recommended to carry out a large sample of prospective studies to build prediction models. Systematic review registration: The protocol for this systematic review was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registered number CRD42022365258.

Indexed as

hip fracturemodelspostoperative deliriumpredictionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37780558
PMCPMC10540206
OpenAlexW4386778883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.