SynthesisPeerJ2023
Systematic and meta-based evaluation of the relationship between the built environment and physical activity behaviors among older adults.
Synthesis in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of nonlinear associations between the built environment and walking in older adults.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Using the Staircase Approach to increase movement: a systematic search and review to inform a novel sedentary behaviour intervention for older adults.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025Pooled it
- Physical exercise and depressive symptoms in older Chinese adults: roles of IADL functional status and social interaction.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Supply-demand structural analysis of sports services in Chinese residential care facilities: a cross-sectional study in Zhengzhou.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Ambient fine-particulate air pollution associates with short sleep duration among 2,082 community-dwelling older adults: findings from a large-scale questionnaire survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A bibliometric study on microenvironment-mediated drug resistance in interventional liver cancer treatment.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Tumour necrosis factor-Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Perineural invasion as a neuro-immune niche in head and neck cancer: mechanisms of immune evasion and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Pro-inflammatory dietary patterns and their association with cardiovascular disease and pancreatic cancer in a hospital population: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Epigenetic control of antigen presentation failure in osteosarcoma: from single-cell chromatin maps to therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Environmental determinants of cerebral haemorrhage in older adults: behavioural pathways and population health implications.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- NGF/BDNF-Trk/p75NTR signaling in osteosarcoma immunity: biomarkers and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Decoding immune low-response states in sepsis: single-cell and 3D spatial transcriptomic insights into immunoparalysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Neurotrophin NGF/TrkA and BDNF/TrkB signaling orchestrates the immune microenvironment in osteosarcoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Walking environments for aging communities in municipality regions in China: measuring physical function toward population health challenges.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome-related headache and delayed cerebral infarction: a mini review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Existing assertions about the relationship between various factors of the built environment and physical activity behaviors are inconsistent and warrant further exploration and analysis. Methods: This study systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar for the effect of the built environment on the physical activity behaviors of older adults. R software was used to calculate the meta-estimated odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Simultaneously, the quality of included studies was evaluated using an observational study quality evaluation standard recommended by American health care quality and research institutions. Results: A total of 16 original researches were included in this meta-analysis and eight factors of the built environment were evaluated. These factors which ranked from high to low according to their impact were traffic safety (OR = 1.58, 95% CI [1.14-2.20]), destination accessibility (OR = 1.24, 95% CI [1.06-1.44]), aesthetics of sports venues (OR = 1.21, 95% CI [1.07-1.37]), virescence of sports venues (OR = 1.14, 95% CI [1.06-1.23]), building density (OR = 1.07, 95% CI [1.02-1.13]). Additionally, it seemed that there was no potential association between mixed land use (OR = 1.01, 95% CI [0.92-1.10]), the quality of pedestrian facilities (OR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.92-1.08]) or commercial facilities (OR = 0.94, 95% CI [0.88-1.00]) and physical activity behaviors of older adults. Conclusions: The built environment has been found to exhibit a significant relationship with the physical activity behaviors of older adults. It is proposed that factors such as traffic safety, destination accessibility, aesthetics of sports venues, virescence of sports venues, and building density be given more consideration when aiming to promote physical activity levels among older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.