Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37780289›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2023

Protein binding assays for an accurate differentiation of vitamin B12 from its inactive analogue. A study on edible cricket powder.

Sergey N Fedosov, Ebba Nexo, Christian W Heegaard, Jarrod Goldin, Joel B Mason

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sergey N FedosovDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, University Town 1874/81, Aarhus C 8000, Denmark.
Ebba NexoDepartment of Clinical Medicine/Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 161, Aarhus N 8200, Denmark.
Christian W HeegaardDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, University Town 1874/81, Aarhus C 8000, Denmark.
Jarrod GoldinEntomo Farms, 31 Industrial Dr., Norwood, Ontario K0L 2V0, Canada.
Joel B MasonU.S.D.A. Human Nutrition Research Center at Tufts University, 711 Washington St., Boston, MA 02111, United States.

Funding

Colorectal tumorigenesis on a cricket powder-based diet versus diets based on more typical protein sourcesR03CA252672 · NCI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI MASON, JOEL B · 2021 to 2022
$151k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA252672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inactive analogues of vitamin B12 (cobalamin, Cbl) can mimic the active Cbl in food if using the traditional microbiological measurements. Thus, overestimated Cbl was recently revealed in edible insects employing immunoaffinity adsorption, HPLC-separation and mass spectrometry (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129048). Here we demonstrate the utility of a convenient binding assay to evaluate Cbl in edible cricket powders. The assay employed the Cbl-specific protein intrinsic factor (IF) and the analogue-detecting protein haptocorrin. The excessive analogues had a weak affinity for IF, resulting in a modest overestimate of Cbl. This overestimate was corrected by a novel mathematical procedure, based on the ratio of analogue/Cbl in the sample and their relative affinities for IF. We found that 100 g of cricket powders contained 40-60 µg of analogues and 0.75-2.2 μg of Cbl. This result was confirmed by HPLC. A correct approach to Cbl-measurements is essential for nutritional assessment of any analogue-containing food.

Indexed as

CorrectionCorrinoidsCricket powderHaptocorrinIntrinsic factorMeasurementVitamin B12

Identifiers

PMID37780289
PMCPMC10534188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.