ArticleSAGE open medical case reports2023
An unusual presentation of accessory spleen mimicking a pancreatic neoplastic lesion in a splenectomized patient: A case report.
Article in SAGE open medical case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accessory spleen is a relatively common occurrence. However, an intrapancreatic accessory spleen can get hypertrophied following splenectomy and rarely mimic a pancreatic neoplasm leading to misdiagnosis. Here we present a 64-year-old male who had undergone left radical nephrectomy and splenectomy for renal cell carcinoma 14 years back, presenting with upper abdominal discomfort. He was found to have a mass in the pancreatic tail on imaging, suggesting an intrapancreatic neoplastic lesion. After a multidisciplinary team decision based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, he underwent an uncomplicated distal pancreatectomy, and the histology revealed an intrapancreatic accessory spleen. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography alone is not specific enough to confidently differentiate an accessory spleen preoperatively. Nuclear scintigraphy fused with contrast-enhanced computed tomography provides more specific and better anatomically localized evidence. Ultrasound-guided fine needle sampling showing lymphocytes with subsets of histiocytes, plasma cells, and immunohistochemistry showing CD8 positivity can be used to guide the definitive diagnosis. Differentiating an accessory spleen from a pancreatic neoplasm may be challenging preoperatively. Accessory spleen needs to be considered in the differential diagnosis of upper abdominal masses especially in patients who have undergone splenectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.