Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37780157›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Measuring personality functioning with the 12-item version of the OPD-Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQS): reliability, factor structure, validity, and measurement invariance in the general population.

Johannes C Ehrenthal, Johannes Kruse, Bjarne Schmalbach, Ulrike Dinger, Samuel Werner, Henning Schauenburg, Elmar Brähler, Hanna Kampling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Personality Functioning in Inpatients With Eating Disorders: Association With Symptom Severity and Treatment Outcome.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Johannes C EhrenthalDepartment of Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Johannes KruseDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Bjarne SchmalbachDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Ulrike DingerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Samuel WernerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Henning SchauenburgDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Elmar BrählerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Hanna KamplingDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The assessment of personality functioning is at the core of current dimensional models of personality disorders. A variety of measures from different clinical and research traditions aim to assess basic psychological capacities regarding the self and others. While some instruments have shown reliability and validity in clinical or other selected samples, much less is known about their performance in the general population. Methods: In three samples representative of the German adult population with a total of 7,256 participants, levels of personality functioning were measured with the short 12-item version of the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis - Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQS). We addressed questions of factor structure, reliability, validity, factorial invariance, and provide norm values. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a satisfactory to good model fit. OPD-SQS models were mostly unaffected by variables such as gender, age, or measurement time. As expected, personality functioning was associated with general psychopathology as well as indices of occupational functioning. Conclusion: The OPD-SQS is a viable measure to assess personality functioning in the general population.

Indexed as

assessmentnorm valuesOPD-SQSpersonality disorderspersonality functioningvalidity

Identifiers

PMID37780157
PMCPMC10536238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.