Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37779917›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2023

Advances and challenges in regenerative dentistry: A systematic review of calcium phosphate and silicate-based materials on human dental pulp stem cells.

B Christie, N Musri, N Djustiana, V Takarini, N Tuygunov, M N Zakaria, A Cahyanto

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Key virulence genes associated withFrontiers in oral health · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

B ChristieFaculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Sekeloa Selatan 1, Bandung, 40134, Indonesia.
N MusriFaculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Sekeloa Selatan 1, Bandung, 40134, Indonesia.
N DjustianaDepartment of Dental Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang Km 21, Jatinangor, 45363, Indonesia.
V TakariniDepartment of Dental Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang Km 21, Jatinangor, 45363, Indonesia.
N TuygunovFaculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
M N ZakariaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
A CahyantoDepartment of Dental Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang Km 21, Jatinangor, 45363, Indonesia.
Padjadjaran University · IDUniversity of Malaya · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional dentistry faces limitations in preserving tooth health due to the finite lifespan of restorative materials. Regenerative dentistry, utilizing stem cells and bioactive materials, offers a promising approach for regenerating dental tissues. Human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) and bioactive materials like calcium phosphate (CaP) and silicate-based materials have shown potential for dental tissue regeneration. This systematic review aims to investigate the effects of CaP and silicate-based materials on hDPSCs through in vitro studies published since 2015. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search strategy was implemented in PubMed MedLine, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect databases. Eligibility criteria were established using the PICOS scheme. Data extraction and risk of bias (RoB) assessment were conducted, with the included studies assessed for bias using the Office of Health and Translation (OHAT) RoB tool. The research has been registered at OSF Registries. Ten in vitro studies met the eligibility criteria out of 1088 initial studies. Methodological heterogeneity and the use of self-synthesized biomaterials with limited generalizability were observed in the included study. The findings highlight the positive effect of CaP and silicate-based materials on hDPSCs viability, adhesion, migration, proliferation, and differentiation. While the overall RoB assessment indicated satisfactory credibility of the reviewed studies, the limited number of studies and methodological heterogeneity pose challenges for quantitative research. In conclusion, this systematic review provides valuable insights into the effects of CaP and silicate-based materials on hDPSCs. Further research is awaited to enhance our understanding and optimize regenerative dental treatments using bioactive materials and hDPSCs, which promise to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Calcium phosphateDental pulpRegenerative medicineSilicatesStem cells

Identifiers

PMID37779917
PMCPMC10539671
OpenAlexW4386945748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.