ArticleRegenerative therapy2023
Perfusion preparation of the rat bladder decellularized scaffold.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- dECM bioinks for 3D bioprinted tumor models: Advances, challenges, and drug screening.iScience · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of Decellularization Methods for the Production of Decellularized Umbilical Cord Matrix.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Bladder reconstruction is a huge challenge in the field of urology. In recent years, perfusion methods have brought promising results in the field of tissue engineering. We prepared bladder decellularized scaffolds by improved perfusion, which may be suitable for bladder reconstruction. Methods: We prepared decellularized scaffolds of rat bladder by perfusion of SDS (0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate), SDS-SDC (0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate +0.5% sodium deoxycholate). Histological characteristics of bladder decellularized scaffolds were assessed by Hematoxylin and eosin, Masson, and DAPI staining. Moreover, we also prepared a murine bladder transplantation model to evaluate the regenerative potential of scaffolds. Results: Hematoxylin and eosin, Masson, and DAPI staining indicated almost no cellular component residues in the SDS-SDC group. Histological analysis (hematoxylin and eosin staining, Masson staining), CD31 and F4/80 staining analysis, one month after implantation, revealed that the decellularized scaffolds had regenerative characteristics, and the SDS-SDC scaffold had better regenerative properties than the SDS scaffold. Conclusions: We successfully prepared the decellularized scaffold for the rat bladder by perfusion. Our results showed that the SDS-SDC scaffold had better decellularization efficiency and reconstruction ability than the SDS scaffold, which provides a new perspective on bladder reconstruction materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.