Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37779765›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists in the Management of Patients With Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review.

Maha Begg, Mawada Tarhuni, Monique N Fotso, Natalie A Gonzalez, Raghavendra R Sanivarapu, Usama Osman, Abishek Latha Kumar, Aishwarya Sadagopan, Anas Mahmoud, Safeera Khan

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Combined Omeprazole andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Towards EffectiveInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maha BeggInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Mawada TarhuniInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfiled, USA.
Monique N FotsoInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Natalie A GonzalezInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Raghavendra R SanivarapuInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfiled, USA.
Usama OsmanInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Abishek Latha KumarInternal Medicine, Pediatrics, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Aishwarya SadagopanInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Anas MahmoudInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfiled, USA.
Safeera KhanInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) refers to the occurrence of an open erosion in the inner lining of the stomach, duodenum, or sometimes lower esophagus. Treatments like proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) are available on the market to efficiently treat the break in the mucosal lining. However, there is little evidence about the effects of the medication on the type and location of the ulcer and the epigastric pain caused by disintegration and increased acidity in the stomach. Given the above, we conducted a systematic review comparing the safety and efficacy of PPIs and H2RAs in various ulcer locations (gastric, duodenal, and pre-pyloric) and the effect of prolonging the treatment with the same medication or changing into a drug from another class in treatment-resistant ulcers. We employed major research literature databases and search engines such as PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Science Direct, and Google Scholar to find relevant articles. After a thorough screening, a quality check using various tools, and applying filters that suited our eligibility criteria, we identified eight articles, of which five were random clinical trials (RCTs), two review articles, and one meta-analysis. This study compares the different side effects of PPIs and H2RAs. Most studies concluded that omeprazole is superior in healing ulcers and bringing pain relief and that patients resistant to H2RAs can be treated better when switched to a PPI. This study also discusses the adverse effects of chronic use, such as diarrhea, constipation, headaches, and gastrointestinal infections. Patients on long-term PPI therapy are required to take calcium supplements to prevent the risk of fractures in older adults. Regarding long-term outcomes, PPIs remain the mainstay of treatment for peptic ulcer disease, based on the papers we reviewed.

Indexed as

drug dosageh2 receptor antagonistpeptic ulcer diseaseproton pump inhibitorssafety and efficacy

Identifiers

PMID37779765
PMCPMC10538946
OpenAlexW4386244504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.