Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37779757›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Retained Ureteral Stent Encrustation After Stent Removal: A Case Report.

Kalley Johnson, Lucas J Betts, Quinn Smith, Johanna Schubert

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kalley JohnsonRadiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, USA.
Lucas J BettsRadiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, USA.
Quinn SmithRadiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, USA.
Johanna SchubertRadiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, USA.
Creighton University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureteral stents are used to relieve acute or chronic urinary tract obstructions and may be complicated by stent encrustation. The development of encrustation is related to indwelling time, stent composition, bacterial biofilm formation, malabsorptive disorders, metabolic disorders (hypercalcemia, hyperuricosuria, pH imbalance), and cancer. Without intervention, encrustation may lead to luminal obstruction, infection, stent fracture, or ureteral avulsion during removal. Rarely, forced removal of an encrusted stent may cause the encrustation to remain in the urinary tract which can lead to further complications. Diagnosis of a retained encrustation includes evaluation with X-ray, ultrasound, and CT. Management strategies of retained encrustations are not standardized but may include removal with flexible ureteroscopy. In the following case, we present a 58-year-old male with retained encrustation material following non-forced stent removal that was not readily observed on initial imaging. CT demonstrated a curved, tubular radiodensity representing calcified encrustation material, and the diagnosis of retained encrustation was confirmed after successful removal with flexible ureteroscopy. We concluded that ureteral stent encrustation can remain in the urinary collecting system following stent removal, although this complication is rare and not well studied.

Indexed as

retained ureteral stent encrustationstent complicationsstent encrustationureteral stentureteral stent removal

Identifiers

PMID37779757
PMCPMC10538860
OpenAlexW4386241750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.