ArticleCureus2023
Exploration of Flexible Pes Planus as a Potential Risk Factor for Cardiac Pathologies in Pediatric Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between flexible pes planus (FPP) and cardiac pathologies in pediatric patients, with a particular emphasis on hypermobility status.
methodsBetween January and June 2022, a retrospective screening was conducted on a total of 68 patients aged between 6 and 18 years who had been diagnosed with FPP. Eight patients were excluded from the study due to suspicion of connective tissue or neuromuscular diseases following systemic examinations conducted by a pediatric specialist. The included 60 patients underwent comprehensive cardiac examinations conducted by pediatric cardiology specialists and were evaluated through echocardiography (ECHO) as part of the study. Simultaneously, a control group of healthy individuals aged 6 to 18, without a diagnosis of pes planus (PP), was selected from those who applied for health reports for the purpose of obtaining sports licenses. Patients diagnosed with FPP were compared to a control group in terms of the presence of cardiac pathology. Furthermore, the Beighton Hypermobility Scores (BHSs) of patients diagnosed with FPP were compared based on the presence of cardiac pathology.
resultsA total of 60 patients (40 males, 20 females) diagnosed with FPP were included in the study, and a control group consisting of 453 healthy individuals (287 males, 166 females) was selected. The incidence of cardiac pathology in patients diagnosed with FPP (23.3%) was found to be significantly higher compared to the control group (7%) (p <0.01). The risk of cardiac pathology in patients diagnosed with FPP was determined to be four times higher compared to the control group (Odds ratio: 4 (1.993-8.046), p<0.01). Among patients with FPP, individuals who were found to have cardiac pathology had statistically significantly higher average BHSs compared to those without cardiac pathology (p: 0.043).
conclusionsOur study suggested that there may be a significant relationship between FPP and high cardiac pathology risk in pediatric patients. We observed a significant increase in the incidence of cardiac pathologies among patients diagnosed with FPP. Additionally, the presence of higher hypermobility scores among patients diagnosed with FPP suggests a potential connection between the two. In the evaluation of FPP in the pediatric population, it should be considered as a potential risk factor for cardiac pathologies and its potential association with hypermobility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.