ReviewActa neurochirurgica2023
Impact of tailored multimodal treatment for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformation: comparison with a randomized trial of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations.
Review in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of the incidence of death, hemorrhage, and neurological deficit in the treatment of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs): surgery versus other treatments - a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Cerebellar Cavernoma Resection: Case Report with Long-Term Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Endovascular embolization of Spetzler-Martin Grade I brain arteriovenous malformations: A case report on patient-centered neurointervention.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe first randomized controlled study on unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVM), the ARUBA trial, demonstrate the superiority of medical management; however, it failed to completely rule out the efficacy of therapeutic interventions due to several limitations. This study aimed to examine the outcomes of multimodal interventional treatment for bAVM in terms of safety and efficacy.
methodsWe reviewed 226 consecutive patients with unruptured bAVM admitted to our institute between 2002 and 2022. Treatment methods were divided into medical management and therapeutic intervention, including microsurgery, stereotactic surgery, and endovascular intervention. First, the choice of therapeutic modalities was assessed in the pre-ARUBA (before February 2014) and post-ARUBA (after March 2014) eras. Second, the incidence of symptomatic stroke or death and functional prognosis with a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of ≥2 at 5 years was compared between the medical management and therapeutic intervention.
resultsIn the pre- and post-ARUBA groups, 73% and 84% of patients underwent therapeutic interventions, respectively (p = 0.053). The rate of symptomatic stroke or death was lower in patients who underwent interventional therapies than in those who underwent medical management (9.7% vs. 22%, p = 0.022); however, the opposite was observed in the ARUBA trial (31% vs. 10%). The annual incidence of stroke or death was also lower in the interventional therapy group (4.3%/y vs. 1.8%/year, hazard ratio = 0.45, 95% confidence interval: 0.18-1.08, p = 0.032). The rate of mRS score of ≥2 after a 5-year follow-up was 18% and 6% in the medical treatment and intervention groups (p = 0.14).
conclusionsThe therapeutic intervention rate did not decrease, even after the publication of the ARUBA trial. The rate of stroke or death was lower in the intervention group, indicating that a tailored choice of multimodality is safe and effective for managing unruptured bAVM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.