ArticleMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2023
High Incidence of Appendiceal Neoplasms in the Elderly: A Critical Concern for Non-Surgical Treatment.
Article in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiology and histopathological spectrum of appendiceal pathologies in 40.286 adults: a multicenter study from Turkey (2017-2025).European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Appendiceal Collision Tumors: An Institutional Case Series and Systematic Review of the Histologic Spectrum, Clinical Outcomes, and Management Strategies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advanced Computational Modeling and Machine Learning for Risk Stratification, Treatment Optimization, and Prognostic Forecasting in Appendiceal Neoplasms.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and CT-measured appendix diameter in occult appendiceal neoplasms: a matched case-control analysis.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Clinicopathological Profile and Management of Appendiceal Neoplasm: An Observational Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2025Observational
- CT of acute abdomen in the elderly.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- The incidence of incidental neoplasia in pathology samples of patient who underwent appendectomy due to acute appendicitis. A single center experience: 6446 cases.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- Risk of appendiceal neoplasm in patients with appendix disorders.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAppendiceal neoplasms (ANs) are rare tumors that are often discovered incidentally during histopathological examinations. The increasing incidence of ANs is a critical issue in the non-operative management of acute appendicitis. This study aimed to document the temporal trends over a 12-year period by analyzing the clinical presentation, imaging findings, and histopathological features of ANs. SUBJECTS AND
methodsHealth records of patients who underwent appendectomy from 2011 to 2022 were examined. Demographic and clinical data, laboratory results, imaging findings, and histopathological features were documented. The characteristics of both ANs and non-neoplastic cases were evaluated.
resultsA total of 22,304 cases were identified, of which 330 (1.5%) were diagnosed with ANs. The odds ratio for ANs increased with age, with the highest odds ratio observed in patients aged 70 or older. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis showed that age and appendiceal diameter were significant predictors of ANs. An optimal age cut-off point of 28.5 years was determined, yielding a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 64%. For appendiceal diameter, the optimal cut-off was found to be 9.5 mm, exhibiting a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 56%.
conclusionAlthough the incidence of ANs remains relatively low, a steady increase has been observed over the past decade. The increasing rate of ANs raises concerns regarding non-surgical management options. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering ANs as a potential diagnosis in older patients and in patients with an appendix diameter greater than 9.5 mm. These findings may have implications for treatment and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.