Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37778219›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of cell biology2023

Purification of modified mammalian actin isoforms for in vitro reconstitution assays.

David J Kast, Silvia Jansen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David J KastDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, United States. Electronic address: kast@wustl.edu.
Silvia JansenDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, United States. Electronic address: silvia.jansen@wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Regulation of membrane trafficking by CoroninsR01GM138448 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JANSEN, SILVIA · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
Regulation of Lipid Droplet Biogenesis and LipophagyR01GM136925 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KAST, DAVID J · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM136925NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM138448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro reconstitution assays using purified actin have greatly improved our understanding of cytoskeletal dynamics and their regulation by actin-binding proteins. However, early purification methods consisted of harsh conditions to obtain pure actin and often did not include correct maturation and obligate modification of the isolated actin monomers. Novel insights into the folding requirements and N-terminal processing of actin as well as a better understanding of the interaction of actin with monomer sequestering proteins such as DNaseI, profilin and gelsolin, led to the development of more gentle approaches to obtain pure recombinant actin isoforms with known obligate modifications. This review summarizes the approaches that can be employed to isolate natively folded endogenous and recombinant actin from tissues and cells. We further emphasize the use and limitations of each method and describe how these methods can be implemented to study actin PTMs, disease-related actin mutations and novel actin-like proteins.

Indexed as

ActinsMicrofilament ProteinsAnimalsGelsolinMammalsProfilinsProtein IsoformsActinsGelsolinMicrofilament ProteinsProfilinsProtein IsoformsActinGelsolinNaa80N-terminal acetylationPurificationSETD3

Identifiers

PMID37778219
PMCPMC10872616
OpenAlexW4387122373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.