Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37777981›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.) group.

Gernot Ortner, Bhaskar Kumar Somani, Selcuk Güven, Gerhard Kitzbichler, Olivier Traxer, Guido Giusti, Silvia Proietti, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Øyvind Ulvik and 16 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 16 institutions in 12 countries.

Gernot OrtnerDepartment of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T, Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria. gerni_o@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2454-6599
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, England.
Selcuk GüvenDepartment of Urology, Meram School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Gerhard KitzbichlerDepartment of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T, Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Olivier TraxerSorbonne University, GRC n°20 Lithiase Renale, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France.
Guido GiustiDepartment of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Silvia ProiettiDepartment of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Evangelos LiatsikosDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Panagiotis KallidonisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Øyvind UlvikDepartment of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Ioannis Kartalas GoumasDepartment of Urology, Istituto Clinico Beato Matteo, Vigevano, Italy.
Mordechai DuvdevaniDepartment of Urology, Hadassah Ein-Kerem University Hospital, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Joyce BaardDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Guido M KamphuisDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stefania FerrettiDepartment of Urology, Hospital and University of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Laurian DragosCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Luca VillaDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Arkadiusz MiernikDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Thomas TaillyDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Amelia PietropaoloDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, England.
Saeed Bin HamriUrology Department at Specialized Medical Center SMC2, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Athanasios Papatsoris2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Ali Serdar GözenDepartment of Urology, Medius Kliniken, Ruit, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Thomas R W HerrmannTraining and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Udo NageleDepartment of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T, Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Theodoros TokasTraining and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Tirol Kliniken · ATAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Patras · GRCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBGhent University Hospital · BEHadassah Medical Center · ILHaukeland University Hospital · NONational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRNecmettin Erbakan University · TRSorbonne Université · FRUMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik · ATUniversity of Crete · GRUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo highlight and compare experts' laser settings during endoscopic laser treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), to identify measures to reduce complications, and to propose guidance for endourologists.

methodsFollowing a focused literature search to identify relevant questions, a survey was sent to laser experts. We asked participants for typical settings during specific scenarios (ureteroscopy (URS), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and percutaneous treatment). These settings were compared among the reported laser types to find common settings and limits. Additionally, we identified preventive measures commonly applied during surgery.

resultsTwenty experts completed the survey, needing a mean time of 12.7 min. Overall, most common laser type was Holmium-Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Ho:YAG) (70%, 14/20) followed by Thulium fiber laser (TFL) (45%, 9/20), pulsed Thulium-Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Tm:YAG) (3/20, 15%), and continuous wave (cw)Tm:YAG (1/20, 5%). Pulse energy for the treatment of distal ureteral tumors was significantly different with median settings of 0.9 J, 1 J and 0.45 J for Ho:YAG, TFL and pulsed Tm:YAG, respectively (p = 0.048). During URS and RIRS, pulse shapes were significantly different, with Ho:YAG being used in long pulse and TFL in short pulse mode (all p < 0.05). We did not find further disparities.

conclusionHo:YAG is used by most experts, while TFL is the most promising alternative. Laser settings largely do not vary significantly. However, further research with novel lasers is necessary to define the optimal approach. With the recent introduction of small caliber and more flexible scopes, minimal-invasive UTUC treatment is further undergoing an extension of applicability in appropriately selected patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellLasers, Solid-StateLithotripsy, LaserUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAluminumHolmiumHumansThuliumYttriumAluminumHolmiumThuliumYttriumyttrium-aluminum-garnetLaserPercutaneousRIRSUrothelial cancerURSUTUC

Identifiers

PMID37777981
OpenAlexW4387234472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.