Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37777814›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2023

A guide to inter-joint coordination characterization for discrete movements: a comparative study.

Océane Dubois, Agnès Roby-Brami, Ross Parry, Mahdi Khoramshahi, Nathanaël Jarrassé

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Océane DuboisInstitute of Intelligent Systems and Robotics (CNRS-UMR 7222), University Pierre & Marie Curie, Paris, France. dubois@isir.upmc.fr.
Agnès Roby-BramiInstitute of Intelligent Systems and Robotics (CNRS-UMR 7222), University Pierre & Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Ross ParryLINP2, UPL, UFR STAPS, University Paris Nanterre, 200 Avenue de la République, 92001, Nanterre, France.
Mahdi KhoramshahiInstitute of Intelligent Systems and Robotics (CNRS-UMR 7222), University Pierre & Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Nathanaël JarrasséInstitute of Intelligent Systems and Robotics (CNRS-UMR 7222), University Pierre & Marie Curie, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing human movement is essential for understanding movement disorders, evaluating progress in rehabilitation, or even analyzing how a person adapts to the use of assistive devices. Thanks to the improvement of motion capture technology, recording human movement has become increasingly accessible and easier to conduct. Over the last few years, multiple methods have been proposed for characterizing inter-joint coordination. Despite this, there is no real consensus regarding how these different inter-joint coordination metrics should be applied when analyzing the coordination of discrete movement from kinematic data. In this work, we consider 12 coordination metrics identified from the literature and apply them to a simulated dataset based on reaching movements using two degrees of freedom. Each metric is evaluated according to eight criteria based on current understanding of human motor control physiology, i.e, each metric is graded on how well it fulfills each of these criteria. This comparative analysis highlights that no single inter-joint coordination metric can be considered as ideal. Depending on the movement characteristics that one seeks to understand, one or several metrics among those reviewed here may be pertinent in data analysis. We propose four main factors when choosing a metric (or a group of metrics): the importance of temporal vs. spatial coordination, the need for result explainability, the size of the dataset, and the computational resources. As a result, this study shows that extracting the relevant characteristics of inter-joint coordination is a scientific challenge and requires a methodical choice. As this preliminary study is conducted on a limited dataset, a more comprehensive analysis, introducing more variability, could be complementary to these results.

Indexed as

MovementMovement DisordersBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansDiscrete tasksInter-joint coordinationKinematic measurementMultiple jointsUpper-limb coordination

Identifiers

PMID37777814
PMCPMC10543874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.