Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37777804›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2023

Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults.

Lorena Cudris-Torres, Stefano Vinaccia Alpi, Álvaro Barrios-Núñez, Natali Gaviria Arrieta, Martha Luz Gómez Campuzano, Giselle Olivella-López, Juan Hernández-Lalinde, Valmore Bermúdez, Olaiza Lobato Pérez, Jorge Armando Niño-Vega and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Self-efficacy for cancer self-management in the context of COVID-19: a cross-sectional survey study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Lorena Cudris-TorresUniversidad de la Costa, Barranquilla, Colombia. lcudris3@cuc.edu.co.
Stefano Vinaccia AlpiUniversidad del Sinú, Montería, Colombia.
Álvaro Barrios-NúñezClínica General del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Natali Gaviria ArrietaUniversidad Popular del Cesar, Valledupar, Colombia.
Martha Luz Gómez CampuzanoUniversidad Popular del Cesar, Valledupar, Colombia.
Giselle Olivella-LópezFundación Universitaria del Área Andina, Valledupar, Colombia.
Juan Hernández-LalindeUniversidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Valmore BermúdezCentro de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Olaiza Lobato PérezUniversidad Popular del Cesar, Valledupar, Colombia.
Jorge Armando Niño-VegaUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Duitama, Colombia.
Jorge Navarro-ObeidCorporación Universitaria del Caribe (CECAR), Sincelejo, Colombia.
Román José Ortega FernándezFundación Universitaria del Área Andina, Valledupar, Colombia.
José Julián JavelaUniversidad del Sinú, Montería, Colombia.
Popular University of Cesar · COFundación Universitaria del Área Andina · COUniversidad del Sinú · COUniversidad Simón Bolívar · COCorporación Universitaria del Caribe · COPedagogical and Technological University of Colombia · COUniversidad del Norte · COUniversity of the Coast · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-efficacy alludes to personal competence in an individual's effectiveness when facing stressful situations. This construct has been related to different domains of the health field, finding that high levels of self-efficacy benefit human functioning and enhance well-being.

methodsThe present study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for managing chronic diseases (SEMCD-S) by assessing factorial, convergent and divergent validity, reliability, and measurement invariance. Likewise, the comparison of self-efficacy according to socio-demographic characteristics was proposed by contrasting latent factors. An instrumental, transactional, descriptive, and non-experimental design study was carried out with the participation of 325 Colombian senior citizens.

resultsThe findings suggest that the scale has appropriate psychometric properties. The one-factor structure exhibited a satisfactory fit, the mean-variance extracted reported acceptable figures and the correlation analysis with other constructs supported this instrument's convergent and discriminant validity. Likewise, it was invariant to the different socio-demographic aspects examined, while the internal consistency figures were high. Differences in the means of the latent factors were only detected in the academic grade. In this case, older adults with a primary school level attained higher self-efficacy values than those who had completed high school or university studies.

conclusionsIt is concluded that the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in the Colombian context to measure and compare this construct.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementSelf EfficacyAgedChronic DiseaseColombiaHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesChronic diseasesColombiaOlder adultsPsychometric propertiesSelf-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID37777804
PMCPMC10543854
OpenAlexW4387217695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.