Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37777802›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2023

Youth and family involvement in the development of a plain language trial results communication tool: CommuniKIDS.

Ami Baba, Dawn P Richards, Maureen Smith, Nicole Pallone, Shelley Vanderhout, Matthew Prebeg, Ellen B M Elsman, Beth K Potter, Martin Offringa, Nancy J Butcher

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ami BabaChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dawn P RichardsClinical Trials Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Maureen SmithCanadian Organization for Rare Disorders, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Nicole PalloneCanPKU and Parent of a Child with an Inherited Metabolic Disease, Sparwood, BC, Canada.
Shelley VanderhoutClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Matthew PrebegDepartment of Psychiatry, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ellen B M ElsmanChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Beth K PotterSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Martin OffringaChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada. martin.offringa@sickkids.ca.
Nancy J ButcherChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada. nancy.butcher@sickkids.ca.

Funding

CIHR MYG-171684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric trials are possible through voluntary participation of children, youth (age ≤ 18 years), and their families. Despite important arguments for trialists to provide trial progress or results, and evidence that participants desire it, this information remains rarely shared with youth and their families. Little guidance exists on how trialists can best communicate trial results back to participants and their families. Guided by Liabo et al.'s framework, we describe how we developed a pediatric-specific, "plain language summary" clinical trial results template called CommuniKIDS with an adult patient partner, family partner (parent), youth advisors, and parent advisors, taking into account their unique knowledge needs and preferences. MAIN TEXT: Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) was integrated in the development of the CommuniKIDS template. In collaboration with Clinical Trials Ontario, we used a generic trial results template as a starting point. The core project leadership team included a patient partner and a family partner from project inception to completion. Five youth (ages 13-18 years) and eight parent advisors were consulted at each point of the development process through three virtual workshops conducted separately; youth workshops were led by a youth facilitator. During these workshops, advisors agreed on the importance and value of sharing trial results, and expressed their preferences on content, format, and timing of sharing trial results. PPI-led improvements included the addition of three new sections to the CommuniKIDS template: "at a glance," "side effects," and "next steps." We reflect on our PPI strategy in the context of five "values" and six "practicalities" identified as good PPI principles, and summarize lessons learned when collaborating with youth and families from this project.

conclusionInvolvement of a patient partner, a family partner, youth advisors, and parent advisors in the development of CommuniKIDS was critical to create a clinical trial results template that is useful and relevant to its end-users. To our knowledge, CommuniKIDS is the first to meaningfully engage youth and parents as advisors and partners in developing a plain language summary results template for pediatric trial participants and their families. Our experience of co-developing CommuniKIDS demonstrates that meaningful PPI can be achieved in trial results communication and knowledge translation practices. This report provides resources for those seeking to involve youth and families in their initiatives and in meaningfully sharing trial results.

Indexed as

Clinical trialsFamily engagementPatient and public involvement (PPI)Patient engagementPlain language summaryTrial resultsYouth engagement

Identifiers

PMID37777802
PMCPMC10544151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.