Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37777714›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023

Predicting tumour content of liquid biopsies from cell-free DNA.

Mathias Cardner, Francesco Marass, Erika Gedvilaite, Julie L Yang, Dana W Y Tsui, Niko Beerenwinkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mathias Cardner *Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5873-2632
Francesco Marass *Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Erika GedvilaiteDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Julie L YangEpigenetics Research Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Dana W Y TsuiDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. dtsui@petdx.com.
Niko BeerenwinkelDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058, Basel, Switzerland. niko.beerenwinkel@bsse.ethz.ch.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
European Research Council Synergy Grant 609883NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiquid biopsy is a minimally-invasive method of sampling bodily fluids, capable of revealing evidence of cancer. The distribution of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragment lengths has been shown to differ between healthy subjects and cancer patients, whereby the distributional shift correlates with the sample's tumour content. These fragmentomic data have not yet been utilised to directly quantify the proportion of tumour-derived cfDNA in a liquid biopsy.

resultsWe used statistical learning to predict tumour content from Fourier and wavelet transforms of cfDNA length distributions in samples from 118 cancer patients. The model was validated on an independent dilution series of patient plasma.

conclusionsThis proof of concept suggests that our fragmentomic methodology could be useful for predicting tumour content in liquid biopsies.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDNAHumansLiquid BiopsyBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNACell-free DNACirculating tumour DNAFragmentomicsLiquid biopsyTumour content

Identifiers

PMID37777714
PMCPMC10543881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.