Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37777707›Full record

ReviewMaternal and child health journal2023

Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths in Namibia, 2018-2019: A Local Approach to Strengthen the Review Process and a Description of Review Findings and Recommendations.

Steffie Heemelaar, Beatrix Callard, Hilma Shikwambi, Jana Ellmies, Wilhelmina Kafitha, Jelle Stekelenburg, Thomas van den Akker, Shonag Mackenzie

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal and child health journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perspectives of pregnant women on the utilisation of a maternity waiting home near Onandjokwe Lutheran Hospital in Oshikoto Region, Namibia.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Steffie HeemelaarNational Maternal Death, Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Review Committee, Division of Quality Assurance, Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia. s.heemelaar@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1172-4237
Beatrix CallardNational Maternal Death, Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Review Committee, Division of Quality Assurance, Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4784-5428
Hilma ShikwambiNational Maternal Death, Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Review Committee, Division of Quality Assurance, Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia.
Jana EllmiesNational Maternal Death, Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Review Committee, Division of Quality Assurance, Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia.
Wilhelmina KafithaDivision of Quality Assurance, Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia.
Jelle StekelenburgDepartment of Health Science, Global Health, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2732-6620
Thomas van den AkkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9890-9145
Shonag MackenzieNational Maternal Death, Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Review Committee, Division of Quality Assurance, Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-5524
Ministry of Health and Social Services · NALeiden University Medical Center · NLInternational University of Management · NAUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Namibia · NA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFirst objective was to strengthen the national maternal death review, by addressing local challenges with each step of the review cycle. Second objective was to describe review findings and compare these with available findings of previous reviews.

methodsConfidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths methodology was used to review maternal deaths. To improve reporting, the national committee focussed on addressing fear of blame among healthcare providers. Second focus was on dissemination of findings and acting on recommendations forthcoming the review. Reviewed were reported maternal deaths, that occurred between 1 April 2018 and 31 March 2019.

resultsSeventy maternal deaths were reported; for 69 (98.6%) medical records were available, compared to 80/119 (67.2%) in 2012-2015. Reported maternal mortality ratio increased with 48% (92/100,000 live births compared to 62/100,000 in 2012-2015). Obstetric haemorrhage was leading cause of death in the past three reviews. The "no name, no blame" policy, aiming to identify health system failures, rather than mistakes of individuals, was repeatedly explained to healthcare providers during facility visits. Recommendations based on findings of the review, such as retaining experienced staff, continuous in-service training and guidance, were shared with decision makers at regional and national levels. Healthcare providers received training based on review findings, which resulted in improved management of similar cases. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Enhanced implementation of Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths was possible after addressing local challenges. Focussing on obtaining trust of healthcare providers and feeding back findings, resulted in better reporting and prevention of potential maternal deaths.

Indexed as

Maternal DeathCause of DeathFemaleHumansLive BirthMaternal MortalityNamibiaPregnancyHIVMaternal mortalityNamibia

Identifiers

PMID37777707
PMCPMC10618300
OpenAlexW4387215091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.