ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
Personalized Numerical Cardiovascular Model with Weight Growth for Evaluating Pediatric Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Derivation from an Experimental Mock Circulatory Loop.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic Speed Modulation Based on Real-Time Cardiac Activity Monitoring for a Next-Generation LVAD.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Impact1: Supporting Innovation in Pediatric and Maternal Health-5 Years of Outcomes.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pediatric patients with heart failure have limited treatment options because of a shortage of donor hearts and compatible left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). To address this issue, our group is developing an implantable pediatric LVAD for patients weighing 5-20 kg, capable of accommodating different physiological hemodynamic conditions as patients grow. To evaluate LVAD prototypes across a wide range of conditions, we developed a numerical cardiovascular model, using data from a mock circulatory loop (MCL) and patient-specific elastance functions. The numerical MCL was validated against experimental MCL results, showing good agreement, with differences ranging from 0 to 11%. The numerical model was also tested under left heart failure conditions and showed a worst-case difference of 16%. In an MCL study with a pediatric LVAD, a pediatric dataset was obtained from the experimental MCL and used to tune the numerical MCL. Then, the numerical model simulated LVAD flow by using an HQ curve obtained from the LVAD's impeller. When the numerical MCL was validated against the experimental MCL, hemodynamic differences ranged between 0 and 9%. These findings suggest that the numerical model can replicate various physiological conditions and impeller designs, indicating its potential as a tool for developing and optimizing pediatric LVADs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37777691What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.