Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37777631›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2023

TeM-DTBA: time-efficient drug target binding affinity prediction using multiple modalities with Lasso feature selection.

Tanya Liyaqat, Tanvir Ahmad, Chandni Saxena

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tanya LiyaqatDepartment of Computer Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India. tanyaliyaqat791@gmail.com.
Tanvir AhmadDepartment of Computer Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.
Chandni SaxenaThe Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, SAR, China.
Jamia Millia Islamia · INChinese University of Hong Kong · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug discovery, especially virtual screening and drug repositioning, can be accelerated through deeper understanding and prediction of Drug Target Interactions (DTIs). The advancement of deep learning as well as the time and financial costs associated with conventional wet-lab experiments have made computational methods for DTI prediction more popular. However, the majority of these computational methods handle the DTI problem as a binary classification task, ignoring the quantitative binding affinity that determines the drug efficacy to their target proteins. Moreover, computational space as well as execution time of the model is often ignored over accuracy. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel method, called Time-efficient Multimodal Drug Target Binding Affinity (TeM-DTBA), which predicts the binding affinity between drugs and targets by fusing different modalities based on compound structures and target sequences. We employ the Lasso feature selection method, which lowers the dimensionality of feature vectors and speeds up the proposed model training time by more than 50%. The results from two benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of performance. The mean squared errors of 18.8% and 23.19%, achieved on the KIBA and Davis datasets, respectively, suggest that our method is more accurate in predicting drug-target binding affinity.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentProteinsDrug Delivery SystemsDrug DiscoveryDrug RepositioningProteinsConvolutional neural networkDeep learningDrug discoveryDrug target binding affinity predictionMultiple modalities

Identifiers

PMID37777631
OpenAlexW4387215495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.