ArticleScientific reports2023
A tool to automatically design multiplex PCR primer pairs for specific targets using diverse templates.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the multigenerational effects of Lippia adoensis (Lamiales: Verbenaceae) essential oil and Dichlorvos on Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) life-history traits and gene expression.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2026Article
- Primer design through submodular function estimation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Accelerating primer design for amplicon sequencing using large language model-powered agents.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- A novel targeted hybrid capture-NGS assay for sensitive detection of multiplex respiratory pathogens.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Finding the MissingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiplex PCR is an increasingly popular method for identifying species, investigating environmental diversity, and conducting phylogenetic analysis. The complexity and increasing availability of diverse templates necessitate a highly automated approach to design degenerate primer pairs for specific targets with multiple sequences. Existing tools for degenerate primer design suffer from poor maintenance, semi-automation, low adaptability, and low tolerance for gaps. We developed PMPrimer, a Python-based tool for automated design and evaluation of multiplex PCR primer pairs for specific targets using diverse templates. PMPrimer automatically designs optimal multiplex PCR primer pairs using a statistical-based template filter; performs multiple sequence alignment, conserved region identification, and primer design; and evaluates the primers based on template coverage, taxon specificity, and target specificity. PMPrimer identifies conserved regions using Shannon's entropy method, tolerates gaps using a haplotype-based method, and evaluates multiplex PCR primer pairs based on template coverage and taxon specificity. We tested PMPrimer using datasets with diverse levels of conservation, sizes, and applications, including tuf genes of Staphylococci, hsp65 genes of Mycobacteriaceae, and 16S ribosomal RNA genes of Archaea. PMPrimer showed outstanding performance compared with existing tools and experimental validated primers. PMPrimer is available as a Python package at https://github.com/AGIScuipeng/PMPrimer .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.