Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37777476›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2023

Gains and losses of the epiphytic lifestyle in epidendroid orchids: review and new analyses of succulence traits.

Géromine Collobert, Benoît Perez-Lamarque, Jean-Yves Dubuisson, Florent Martos

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Orchid genome evolution and trait innovation.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The complete plastid genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Géromine CollobertInstitut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles, CP 39, 57 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France.
Benoît Perez-LamarqueInstitut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS), École Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
Jean-Yves DubuissonInstitut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles, CP 39, 57 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France.
Florent MartosInstitut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles, CP 39, 57 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRInstitut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsEpiphytism has evolved repeatedly in plants and has resulted in a considerable number of species with original characteristics. Because water supply is generally erratic compared to that in soils, succulent forms in particular are widespread in epiphytic species. However, succulent organs also exist in terrestrial plants, and the question of the concomitant evolution of epiphytism and succulence has received little attention, not even in the epidendroid orchids, which account for 67.6 % of vascular epiphytes.

methodsWe built a new time-calibrated phylogenetic tree of Epidendroideae with 203 genera treated in genus Orchidacearum, from which we reconstructed the evolution of epiphytism as well as traits related to water scarcity (stem and leaf succulence and the number of velamen layers), while testing for the correlated evolution between the two. Furthermore, we estimated the ancestral geographical ranges to evaluate the palaeoclimatic context in which epiphytism evolved. KEY

resultsEpiphytism evolved at least three times: 39.0 million years ago (Mya) in the common ancestor of the Malaxideae and Cymbidieae that probably ranged from the Neotropics to Southeast Asia and Australia, 11.5 Mya in the Arethuseae in Southeast Asia and Australia, and 7.1 Mya in the neotropical Sobralieae, and it was notably lost in the Malaxidiinae, Collabieae, Calypsoeae, Bletiinae and Eulophiinae. Stem succulence is inferred to have evolved once, in a terrestrial ancestor at least 4.1 Mya before the emergence of epiphytic lineages. If lost, stem succulence was almost systematically replaced by leaf succulence in epiphytic lineages.

conclusionsEpiphytism may have evolved in seasonally dry forests during the Eocene climatic cooling, among stem-succulent terrestrial orchids. Our results suggest that the emergence of stem succulence in early epidendroids was a key innovation in the evolution of epiphytism, facilitating the colonization of epiphytic environments that later led to the greatest diversification of epiphytic orchids.

Indexed as

OrchidaceaeSoilForestsPhenotypePhylogenySoilancestral reconstructionEpidendroideaegenus Orchidacearumhidden Markov model (HMM)key innovationOrchidaceaepseudobulbssucculence traitsvascular epiphytismvelamen

Identifiers

PMID37777476
PMCPMC10799982
OpenAlexW4387222659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.