ArticleSaudi medical journal2023
The effect of poor glycemic control on cognitive function in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A single-center cross-sectional study (2019-2020).
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cognitive skills in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a scoping review and meta-analysis.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2026Pooled it
- International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2024: Glycemic Targets.Hormone research in paediatrics · 2024Guideline
- Clinical Aspects and Molecular Mechanisms of Cognitive Dysfunction in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cognitive Assessment in Adults With Adrenal Cortisol Insufficiency: Challenges and Opportunities.Endocrine reviews · 2026Review
- Diabetes-related cognitive impairment: Mechanisms, symptoms, and treatments.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the effect of chronic hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) on the cognitive function of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and explore whether early disease onset correlated with cognitive impairment.
methodsChildren and adolescents with T1DM who attended the Pediatric Diabetes Clinic between January 2019 and 2020, aged between 5-14 years, with a mean of 3 glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) readings ≥7% (53 mmol/mol) during the study period reflecting a hyperglycemic status and who agreed to participate were interviewed about their history of hypoglycemia and DKA. Participants were personally interviewed by a clinical psychologist to assess their cognitive function using a validated Arabic version of the Stanford-Binet test.
resultsHigher mean HbA1c levels were associated with cognitive dysfunction in three verbal domains: fluid reasoning, quantitative reasoning, and working memory. Frequent hypoglycemia negatively affected verbal knowledge. In contrast, significant hypoglycemia affected both verbal and nonverbal domains of cognition, specifically verbal and nonverbal fluid reasoning, knowledge, and working memory. Children with recurrent DKA performed below average in nonverbal fluid reasoning tasks. Additionally, moderate or severe DKA, regardless of its frequency, affected children's overall intelligence quotient.
conclusionRegardless of disease onset, exposure to glycemic variability subjects children and adolescents to subtle and measurable cognitive dysfunction resulting in significant morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.