Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37777066›Full record

ArticleJournal of sport and health science2024

A scoping review of methodologies for applying artificial intelligence to physical activity interventions.

Ruopeng An, Jing Shen, Junjie Wang, Yuyi Yang

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sport and health science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruopeng AnBrown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA. Electronic address: ruopeng@wustl.edu.
Jing ShenDepartment of Physical Education, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.
Junjie WangSchool of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Yuyi YangBrown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA; Division of Computational and Data Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.

Funding

Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis scoping review aimed to offer researchers and practitioners an understanding of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in physical activity (PA) interventions; introduce them to prevalent machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms; and encourage the adoption of AI methodologies.

methodsA scoping review was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO focusing on AI applications for promoting PA or predicting related behavioral or health outcomes. AI methodologies were summarized and categorized to identify synergies, patterns, and trends informing future research. Additionally, a concise primer on predominant AI methodologies within the realm of PA was provided to bolster understanding and broader application.

resultsThe review included 24 studies that met the predetermined eligibility criteria. AI models were found effective in detecting significant patterns of PA behavior and associations between specific factors and intervention outcomes. Most studies comparing AI models to traditional statistical approaches reported higher prediction accuracy for AI models on test data. Comparisons of different AI models yielded mixed results, likely due to model performance being highly dependent on the dataset and task. An increasing trend of adopting state-of-the-art DL and RL models over standard ML was observed, addressing complex human-machine communication, behavior modification, and decision-making tasks. Six key areas for future AI adoption in PA interventions emerged: personalized PA interventions, real-time monitoring and adaptation, integration of multimodal data sources, evaluation of intervention effectiveness, expanding access to PA interventions, and predicting and preventing injuries.

conclusionThe scoping review highlights the potential of AI methodologies for advancing PA interventions. As the field progresses, staying informed and exploring emerging AI-driven strategies is essential for achieving significant improvements in PA interventions and fostering overall well-being.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceExerciseAlgorithmsDeep LearningHealth PromotionHumansMachine LearningArtificial intelligenceInterventionMachine learningNeural networkPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID37777066
PMCPMC11116969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.