Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37776483›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2024

Identification of influence factors in overweight population through an interpretable risk model based on machine learning: a large retrospective cohort.

Wei Lin, Songchang Shi, Huiyu Lan, Nengying Wang, Huibin Huang, Junping Wen, Gang Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wei Lin *Department of Endocrinology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, FuZhou, 350001, PR China. caolalin0929@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0455-8752
Songchang Shi *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital South Branch, Fujian Provincial Hospital Jinshan Branch, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, PR China.
Huiyu LanDepartment of Endocrinology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, FuZhou, 350001, PR China.
Nengying WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, FuZhou, 350001, PR China.
Huibin HuangDepartment of Endocrinology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, FuZhou, 350001, PR China.
Junping WenDepartment of Endocrinology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, FuZhou, 350001, PR China.
Gang ChenDepartment of Endocrinology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, FuZhou, 350001, PR China. chengangfj@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8105-2384

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFC2001100-5Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2022J011017the Innovation Project of Fujian Provincial Health Commission 2021CXA003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe identification of associated overweight risk factors is crucial to future health risk predictions and behavioral interventions. Several consensus problems remain in machine learning, such as cross-validation, and the resulting model may suffer from overfitting or poor interpretability.

methodsThis study employed nine commonly used machine learning methods to construct overweight risk models. The general community are the target of this study, and a total of 10,905 Chinese subjects from Ningde City in Fujian province, southeast China, participated. The best model was selected through appropriate verification and validation and was suitably explained.

resultsThe overweight risk models employing machine learning exhibited good performance. It was concluded that CatBoost, which is used in the construction of clinical risk models, may surpass previous machine learning methods. The visual display of the Shapley additive explanation value for the machine model variables accurately represented the influence of each variable in the model.

conclusionsThe construction of an overweight risk model using machine learning may currently be the best approach. Moreover, CatBoost may be the best machine learning method. Furthermore, combining Shapley's additive explanation and machine learning methods can be effective in identifying disease risk factors for prevention and control.

Indexed as

Machine LearningOverweightChinaEast Asian PeopleHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsInterpretableMachine learningOverweightPrediction modelRisk

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.