Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37776480›Full record

ReviewDermatology and therapy2023

Omalizumab for Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Narrative Review of Current Status.

Thomas B Casale, Ana Maria Gimenez-Arnau, Jonathan A Bernstein, Michael Holden, Torsten Zuberbier, Marcus Maurer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Family quality-of-life burden in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A multicentre study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Targeting Mast Cells in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Type 2 Inflammation and Its Role in Dermatologic Diseases.International journal of dermatology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas B CasaleInternal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA. tbcasale@usf.edu.
Ana Maria Gimenez-ArnauDermatology Department, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Jonathan A BernsteinDepartment of Medicine, Division of Immunology Allergy Section, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Michael HoldenGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Torsten ZuberbierInstitute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Marcus MaurerInstitute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEHospital del Mar Research Institute · ESUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a debilitating inflammatory disorder of the skin, characterized by a fluctuating natural history, a complex mechanism of action, and a significant burden on patients, including effect on quality of life, development of psychosocial disorders, and a range of comorbidities. Recent international guidelines recommend a therapeutic approach of first-line treatment with second generation H1-antihistamines and second-line treatment with the biologic omalizumab. Here, the salient aspects of CSU and current status of data for omalizumab for patients with CSU are reviewed, with a focus on mechanism of action, efficacy and real-world effectiveness (including patient outcomes, response, relapse, and remission), and safety (including consideration of the risk of anaphylaxis). The review also considers recent data on COVID-19, CSU, and omalizumab and presents our perspective on future needs. Overall, the data suggest that omalizumab is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with CSU that provides benefits for a wide range of patients.

Indexed as

AllergyAngioedemaChronic spontaneous urticariaIgEImmunoglobulin EOmalizumabWheals

Identifiers

PMID37776480
PMCPMC10613187
OpenAlexW4387218823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.