Trial reportAdvances in therapy2023
Psychometric Validation of the Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire Using Data From Two Phase III, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Non-Inferiority Studies in People Living With HIV.
Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Long-Acting Intramuscular Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine for Maintenance of Virologic Suppression Following Switch From an Integrase Inhibitor Single Tablet Regimen in HIV-1 Infected Antiretroviral Therapy Naive Adult Participants
A Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Non-inferiority, Open-label Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Switching to Long-acting Cabotegravir Plus Long-acting Rilpivirine From Current INI- NNRTI-, or PI-based Antiretroviral Regimen in HIV-1-infected Adults Who Are Virologically Suppressed
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Acting Cabotegravir Injections Are More Acceptable Than Long-Acting Lenacapavir Injections After One Dose: Results From the CLARITY Randomized Crossover Study.Advances in therapy · 2026Trial
- Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes After 12 Months of Maintenance Therapy With Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine Long-Acting Compared With Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in the Phase 3b SOLAR Study.AIDS and behavior · 2025Trial
- Narrative Review of Two-Drug Regimens in Modern HIV Care: Driving Innovation, Flexibility, and Quality of Life.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Review
- Effectiveness, Sex Differences, and Patient Experience in Real-World Use of Long-Acting Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine: Results from a Prospective Study.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Cabotegravir+rilpivirine long-acting every 2 months in a real-world setting: 24-month outcomes in people with HIV-1.AIDS (London, England) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCurrently, there are no patient-reported outcome tools specifically validated for use in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) to measure treatment injection acceptance and experience. The Perception of Injection (PIN) questionnaire was modified with consent from the Vaccinees' Perception of Injection (VAPI), a validated instrument developed by Sanofi Pasteur. The objective of developing the PIN was to provide information on participant experience with injectable therapies, including acceptance of pain, injection-site reactions, and tolerability following injections in PLHIV.
methodsThis post hoc analysis used data from participants who received the long-acting intramuscular cabotegravir plus rilpivirine combination treatment every 4 weeks, as part of the ATLAS (NCT02951052) and FLAIR (NCT02938520) studies, to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PIN questionnaire.
resultsThese findings support the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change for the PIN questionnaire in PLHIV.
conclusionAs a clinical trial endpoint, the PIN questionnaire could provide valuable evidence around the acceptance and experience of injections in PLHIV which could have implications for treatment adherence in this population.
trial registrationATLAS (NCT02951052); 1 November, 2016. FLAIR (NCT02938520); 19 October, 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.