ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
Evaluation of Barrier Integrity Using a Two-Layered Microfluidic Device Mimicking the Blood-Brain Barrier.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modular cone-and-plate device for mechanofluidic assays in Transwell inserts.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Involvement of Astrocytes in the Formation, Maintenance, and Function of the Blood-Brain Barrier.Cells · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The blood-brain barrier (BBB) plays an essential role in maintaining the homeostasis of the brain microenvironment by controlling the influx and efflux of biological substances that are necessary to sustain the neuronal metabolic activity and functions. This barrier is established at the blood-brain interface of the brain microcapillaries by different cells. These include microvascular endothelial cells, astrocytes, and pericytes besides other components such as microglia, basal membrane, and neuronal cells forming together what is commonly referred to as the neurovascular unit; different in vivo and in vitro platforms are available to study the BBB where each system provides specific benefits and drawbacks. Recently, organ-on-a-chip platforms combine the elegance of microengineering technology with the complexity of biological systems to create near-ideal experimental models for various diseases and organs. These microfluidic devices with micron-sized channels allow the cells to be grown in a more biologically relevant environment, enabling cell to cell communications with continuous bathing in biological fluids in a tissue-like fashion. They also closely represent tissue and organ functionality by recapitulating mechanical forces as well as vascular perfusion. Here, we describe the use of humanized BBB model created with microfluidic organ-on-a-chip technology where human brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs) are cocultured with primary human pericytes and astrocytes. We thoroughly described the method to assess BBB integrity using a microfluidic chip and various sizes of labeled dextran as permeability markers. In addition, we provide a detailed protocol on how to microscopically investigate the tight junction proteins expression between hBMECs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37776450What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.