Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37776404›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2024

Conduction system pacing: how far are we from the "electrical" bypass?

Evangelos Sdogkos, Konstantinos Iliodromitis, Andrew Xanthopoulos, Filippos Triposkiadis, John Skoularigis, Harilaos Bogossian, Ioannis Vogiatzis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Evangelos SdogkosDepartment of Cardiology, General Hospital of Veroia, Veroia, Greece. evag.sdogkos@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7821-797X
Konstantinos IliodromitisKlinik Für Kardiologie und Rhythmologie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe, Brusebrinkstraße 20, 58135, Hagen, Germany.
Andrew XanthopoulosDepartment of Cardiology, University Ηospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Filippos TriposkiadisDepartment of Cardiology, University Ηospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
John SkoularigisDepartment of Cardiology, University Ηospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Harilaos BogossianKlinik Für Kardiologie und Rhythmologie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hagen-Haspe, Brusebrinkstraße 20, 58135, Hagen, Germany.
Ioannis VogiatzisDepartment of Cardiology, General Hospital of Veroia, Veroia, Greece.
University Hospital of Larissa · GRFernUniversität in Hagen · DEVeria General Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conduction system pacing is an alternative practice to conventional right ventricular apical pacing. It is a method that maintains physiologic ventricular activation, based on a correct pathophysiological basis, in which the pacing lead bypasses the lesion of the electrical fibers and the electrical impulse transmits through the intact adjacent conduction system. For this reason, it might be reasonably characterized by the term "electrical bypass" compared to the coronary artery bypass in revascularization therapy. In this review, reference is made to the sequence of events in which conventional right ventricular pacing may cause adverse outcomes. Furthermore, there is a reference to alternative strategies and pacing sites. Interest focuses on the modalities for which there are data from the literature, namely for the right ventricular (RV) septal pacing, the His bundle pacing (HBP), and the left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). A more extensive reference is about the HBP, for which there are the most updated data. We analyze the considerations that limit HBP-wide application in three axes, and we also present the data for the implantation and follow-up of these patients. The indications with their most important studies to date are then described in detail, not only in their undoubtedly positive findings but also in their weak aspects, because of which this pacing mode has not yet received a strong recommendation for implementation. Finally, there is a report on LBBP, focusing mainly on its points of differentiation from HBP.

Indexed as

Bundle of HisCardiac Pacing, ArtificialElectrocardiographyHeart Conduction SystemHeart VentriclesHumansTreatment OutcomeConduction system pacingElectrical bypassHis bundle pacingLeft bundle branch pacingPacemaker

Identifiers

PMID37776404
OpenAlexW4387220813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.