Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37776354›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2023

Glutamic acid intake by formula-fed infants: are acceptable daily intakes appropriate?

Julie A Mennella, Alissa D Smethers, Michelle T Delahanty, Virginia A Stallings, Jillian C Trabulsi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01700205 (Impact of Diet Composition on Energy Balance and Satiety During Infancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01700205 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Diet Composition on Energy Balance and Satiety During Infancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorMonell Chemical Senses CenterRan2012 to 2016Enrolled113ConditionsDevelopmentArmsType of Formula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julie A MennellaMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-3308, USA. mennella@monell.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8855-0204
Alissa D SmethersMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-3308, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2643-0335
Michelle T DelahantyDepartment of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19173, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7914-264X
Virginia A StallingsChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 19146, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7025-7149
Jillian C TrabulsiDepartment of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19173, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5411-5204
Monell Chemical Senses Center · USUniversity of Delaware · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · US

Funding

Impact of diet composition during infancy on energy balance, satiety and growthR01HD072307 · NICHD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI MENNELLA, JULIA ANNE, TRABULSI, JILLIAN CHRISTINE · 2012 to 2016
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD072307NIH HHS HD072307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2017 European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recommendation of an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 30 mg glutamic acid/kg bw/day did not take into consideration the primary energy sources during infancy, including infant formulas. In the present study, we determined total daily intakes of glutamic acid in a contemporary cohort of healthy infants who were fed either cow milk formula (CMF) or extensive protein hydrolysate formula (EHF); the formulas differed substantially in glutamic acid content. The infants (n = 141) were randomized to be fed either CMF or EHF. Dietary intakes were determined from weighed bottle methods and/or prospective diet records, and body weights were measured on 14 occasions from 0.5 to 12.5 months. Secondary data analysis determined the glutamic acid content of the diet over time. The trial was registered at  http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ as NCT01700205, 3 October 2012. Glutamic acid intake from formula and other foods was significantly higher in infants fed EHF when compared to CMF. As glutamic acid intake from formula decreased, intake from other nutritional sources steadily increased from 5.5 months. Regardless of formula type, every infant exceeded the ADI of 30 mg/kg bw/day from 0.5 to 12.5 months.   Conclusion: Given that the ADI recommendation was not based on actual intake data of primary energy sources during infancy, the present findings on the growing child's ingestion of glutamic acid from infant formula and the complementary diet may be of interest when developing future guidelines and communications to parents, clinical care providers, and policy makers. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The 2017 re-evaluation of the safety of glutamic acid-glutamates and the recommended acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 30 mg/kg bw/d by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) did not include actual intake data of the primary energy sources during infancy. WHAT IS NEW: • During the first year, glutamic acid intake from infant formula and other food sources exceeded the ADI of 30 mg/kg bw/day.

Indexed as

Glutamic AcidInfant FormulaAnimalsCattleChildFemaleHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMilkNo-Observed-Adverse-Effect LevelProspective StudiesProtein HydrolysatesGlutamic AcidProtein HydrolysatesAcceptable daily intakeComplementary dietFormulaGlutamic acidInfantMonosodium glutamateSafety

Identifiers

PMID37776354
PMCPMC10746772
OpenAlexW4387212979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.