Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37776205›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2023

Rapid detection of Salmonella enterica in primary production samples by eliminating DNA amplification inhibitors using an improved sample pre-treatment method.

Aaydha Chidambara Vinayaka, Than Linh Quyen, Van Ngoc Huynh, Mogens Madsen, Dang Duong Bang, Anders Wolff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Dual-Gene Colorimetric LAMP Assay for Genus-Level Detection ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaydha Chidambara VinayakaLaboratory of Applied Micro and Nanotechnology (LAMINATE), DTU-Bioengineering (Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1813-4560
Than Linh QuyenBiolabchip group, DTU-Bioengineering (Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Van Ngoc HuynhBiolabchip group, DTU-Bioengineering (Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Mogens MadsenBiolabchip group, DTU-Bioengineering (Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Dang Duong BangLaboratory of Applied Micro and Nanotechnology (LAMINATE), DTU-Bioengineering (Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Anders WolffBiolabchip group, DTU-Bioengineering (Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Technical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitive detection of pathogens in livestock farms is an integral part of the One Health Action Plan of the European Union (EU). Ensuring this requires on-site testing devices that are compatible with complex matrices such as primary production samples. Among all, faeces are considered the most challenging matrix type that makes it difficult to identify pathogens because of complexity in sample preparation for molecular testing. We have developed a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) based veterinary point-of-care (POC) device (VETPOD) and adapted it to detect Salmonella enterica in primary production samples. Three different sampling methods (semi-wet chicken faeces, boot socks collection and dust samples from poultry shed) were iteratively tested to assess their nature of complexity and possibility for adapting them as suitable sampling methods for on-site testing. During the study, the sample preparation method that included a two-step centrifugation combined with washing of the enriched Salmonella cells was found crucial in eliminating amplification inhibitors originating from the faecal matrices. A total of 90 samples were tested that included 60 samples for sensitivity study and 30 samples for relative level of detection (RLOD, a level of detection in comparison to ISO 6579:1 reference method). Overall, the VETPOD had a sensitivity of 90%, 84.62% and 81.82% for boot sock, faecal and dust samples, respectively. The RLOD was 2.23 CFU/25 g which was found to be 1.33 times higher than the ISO 6579:1. Performing with an excellent agreement with ISO 6579:1, the VETPOD proved as a promising alternative to detect Salmonella spp. in primary production and animal husbandry samples.

Indexed as

Salmonella entericaAnimalsChickensDNADustSalmonellaSensitivity and SpecificityDNADust

Identifiers

PMID37776205
PMCPMC10616646
OpenAlexW4387218808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.