Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37776037›Full record

ArticleWomen's health (London, England)

Pregnant and lactating people's strategies to mitigate the risk of cannabis consumption.

Anuoluwa Popoola, Janelle Panday, Shipra Taneja, Devon Greyson, Sarah D McDonald, Tejal Patel, Elizabeth Darling, Meredith Vanstone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anuoluwa PopoolaDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Janelle PandayDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Shipra TanejaDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Devon GreysonDepartment of Communication, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
Sarah D McDonaldDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radiology and Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4461-2178
Tejal PatelDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Elizabeth DarlingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Meredith VanstoneDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7347-6259
McMaster University · CAImpact · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

CIHR FRN 16792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple studies have demonstrated that pregnant and lactating people who use cannabis perceive a variety of benefits from that use, offering some explanation of why rates of use continue to increase.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to explore pregnant and lactating people's perceptions of the risks of cannabis use and understand what steps, if any, they take to mitigate these risks.

designQualitative description.

methodsWe analyzed semi-structured interviews with 52 Canadians who made the decision to start, stop, or continue using cannabis during pregnancy or lactation between 2019 and 2021. Data collection iterated with analysis. We used a conventional (inductive) approach to content analysis.

resultsPerception of risk was found to be an essential component of decision-making about cannabis use. We identified a cycle of "risk identification," "management," and "observation" of effects. First, the pregnant or lactating person assesses the risks and weighs them against the perceived benefits of cannabis use. Second, they take action to minimize risks, with some choosing abstinence. Others, often those who were using cannabis to manage symptoms, continued cannabis use but devised a variety of other risk mitigation strategies such as, decreasing the amount or frequency of their use, changing the form of cannabis, and strategically timing their use with caregiving responsibilities. The final stage of the cycle involves seeking information about whether or not the initial perceived risk has manifested after implementing mitigation strategies, through observations and clinical information about the pregnancy or child.

conclusionParticipants consistently engaged in deliberation about the risks and benefits associated with their perinatal cannabis use. Nearly all implemented strategies intended to minimize risk. Our results highlight the need for more research to inform clear public health messaging about risk mitigation to minimize the potential harms of perinatal cannabis use. This work informs clinicians about patient-perceived risks and mitigation strategies which could in turn help inform shared decision-making conversations.

Indexed as

CannabisBreast FeedingCanadaFemaleHumansInfantLactationPregnancycannabisharm reductionlactationpregnancyrisk

Identifiers

PMID37776037
PMCPMC10541750
OpenAlexW4387210014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.