Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37775967›Full record

ArticleJDR clinical and translational research2024

Dentists' Approaches to Treatment Decision-Making for People with Dementia: A Qualitative Study.

A Geddis-Regan, C Abley, C Exley, R Wassall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDR clinical and translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A Geddis-ReganUniversity Dental Hospital of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3335-6455
C AbleyNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
C ExleyPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
R WassallSchool of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6851-5666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlobally, the number of people living with dementia (PLwD) is projected to increase substantially. Dentists will encounter an increasing number of PLwD retaining natural teeth who need dental care. Dental treatment planning can be complex for PLwD as both oral diseases and dental treatment can be detrimental to patients' oral and social function and comfort. In addition, patients may lack the capacity to make decisions about their treatment, posing further challenges for dentists.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore dentists' approach to treatment decision-making with or for PLwD.

methodsSemistructured one-to-one interviews were completed with 22 dentists between April 2020 and March 2021. Data generation and analysis followed the principles of constructivist grounded theory with data being collected and analyzed simultaneously using a maximum variation sample. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and then analyzed, leading to a theoretical understanding of how dentists approach treatment decisions for PLwD.

resultsFour data categories describe dentists' approaches to treatment decision-making for PLwD. Dentists sought to provide individualized care for PLwD. However, they described planning care based on risk-benefit analyses that primarily considered biomedical factors and generic assumptions. There was an underemphasis on the psychological or social implications of dental care or its delivery. Furthermore, while some dentists attempted to involve patients in treatment decisions, they reported fewer attempts to identify the views and preferences of PLwD identified as lacking decisional capacity. In this scenario, dentists reported leading the decision-making process with little regard for patients' known or identified preferences and minimal involvement of PLwD's family.

conclusionsDentists acknowledge the complexity in treatment decision-making for PLwD yet focused heavily on biomedical considerations, with an underemphasis on individuals' preferences and autonomy. Considering psychosocial aspects of care alongside biomedical factors is essential to support holistic person-centered care for this growing patient cohort. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: This study highlighted that dentists may only be considering biomedical aspects of care when considering what treatment is appropriate for people living with dementia. When making or supporting treatment decisions, dentists should explore patients' preferences and actively consider relevant psychosocial factors. These can be actively identified through considered discussions with patients as well as their family members. Gathering this information should support more person-centered and value-concordant decision-making for people living with dementia.

Indexed as

DementiaDentistsQualitative ResearchAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical Decision-MakingDecision MakingDental CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Dentists'decision making shareddental care for agedgeriatric dentistryhealth services for the agedpatient care planningpatient participation

Identifiers

PMID37775967
PMCPMC11318378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.