Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37775759›Full record

ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2023

What proportion of couples with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss and with a balanced rearrangement in one parent can potentially be identified through cell-free DNA genotyping?

Laura J C M van Zutven, Jona Mijalkovic, Monique van Veghel-Plandsoen, Margaret Goense, Marike Polak, Maarten F C M Knapen, Sabina de Weerd, Marieke Joosten, Karin E M Diderich, Lies H Hoefsloot and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura J C M van ZutvenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jona MijalkovicDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Monique van Veghel-PlandsoenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Margaret GoenseDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marike PolakDepartment of Psychology, Education & Child Studies (DPECS), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten F C M KnapenDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Wytemaweg 80, Na-1517, 3015 GE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sabina de WeerdDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Albert Schweitzerplaats 25, 3318 AT, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Marieke JoostenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Karin E M DiderichDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lies H HoefslootDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Diane Van OpstalDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Malgorzata I SrebniakDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.srebniak@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBalanced chromosome aberrations are reported in about 1:30 couples with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Karyotyping of both parents is necessary to identify these aberrations. Genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in case of recurrent pregnancy loss could be a more efficient way to identify couples at increased risk for carrying a balanced chromosome rearrangement. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the potential fetal imbalances caused by parental balanced aberrations detected in our center are large enough to be detectable by genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). MATERIAL AND

methodsFrom January 1970 until May 2020 our laboratory received 30,863 unique requests for karyotyping due to RPL. We have identified 16,045 couples and evaluated all abnormal cytogenetic results to assess the minimal size of the involved chromosomal segments in potential unbalanced products of the rearrangements.

resultsIn the presented cohort we detected 277 aberrant balanced translocations/inversions in females and 185 in males amongst 16,045 couples with RPL, which can be translated to a risk of 1:35 (2.9%, 95% CI 2.6-3.2%). Our study showed that the vast majority (98.7%, 95% CI 97.1-99.5%) of these balanced aberrations will potentially cause a fetal imbalance > 10 Mb, which is detectable with genome-wide NIPT if it was performed during one of the miscarriages.

conclusionsOur study suggests that genome-wide NIPT is able to reveal most unbalanced products of balanced chromosomal rearrangements carried by couples with RPL and therefore can potentially identify balanced chromosomal aberration carriers. Moreover, our data suggest that these couples can be offered NIPT in case they decline invasive testing in future pregnancies.

Indexed as

Balanced translocationcfDNAKaryotypingNIPTRecurrent pregnancy loss

Identifiers

PMID37775759
PMCPMC10543837
OpenAlexW4387166534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.