Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37775604›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2023

Big advocacy, little recognition: the hidden work of Black patients in precision medicine.

Lynette Hammond Gerido, Kenneth Resnicow, Elena M Stoffel, Tiah Tomlin, Robert Cook-Deegan, Melissa Cline, Amy Coffin, Jill Holdren, Mary Anderlik Majumder, Zhe He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An Ethical Approach to Genomic Privacy Preserving Technology Development.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Reliance on Advocacy is the Symptom Not the Disease.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lynette Hammond GeridoDepartment of Bioethics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106-4976, USA. lynette.gerido@case.edu.
Kenneth ResnicowSchool of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Elena M StoffelRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Tiah TomlinPatient Advocate, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Robert Cook-DeeganArizona State University, Washington, DC, USA.
Melissa ClineUniversity of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Amy CoffinVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Jill HoldrenPatient Advocate, Boulder, CO, USA.
Mary Anderlik MajumderBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Zhe HeFlorida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

Funding

Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
University of Michigan Training Program in ELSI ResearchT32HG010030 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROBERTS, SCOTT · 2018 to 2022
$962k
NCI NIH HHS L60 CA274876NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG010030NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As cost-effective next-generation genome sequencing rapidly develops, calls for greater inclusion of Black people in genomic research, policy, and practice are necessary for effective translation of genomic science into precision population health and medicine. Employing a community-based participatory mixed methods research design, we developed a semi-structured survey that was disseminated to three cancer advocacy organizations. Of the 81 survey respondents 49 (60%) self-identified as Black, and 26 (32%) indicated a prior breast cancer diagnosis. Black participants' expressed concerns about genetic testing were evenly distributed between concerns that could be addressed through genetic counseling (24%) and concerns about subsequent use of their genetic data (27%). Patient advocates contributed to contextualization of respondent concerns in terms of community experiences. Although genetic counseling services and policies governing genomic data use are not always accessible to many Black communities, advocates on our research team provided a bridge to discussion of the intersection between respondent concerns and the roles advocates play in filling gaps in access to genetic counseling and data governance. Concerns expressed by Black patients underscore a shared need among all patients for access to education, inclusion in research, and assurances regarding the use and handling of genetic data. Black cancer patients have joined in patient-led efforts to overcome systemic inequities in cancer care to improve their health outcomes through representation. Often their efforts are overshadowed by a relentless burden of continued health disparities. Future research should support their hidden work as a means to reduce barriers and improve representation in genomic databases.

Indexed as

African AmericansBiomedical researchBreast cancerData ethicsGenetic testing, Advocacy

Identifiers

PMID37775604
PMCPMC10725382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.