Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37775576›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024

Evaluating the Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Postoperative Pain Management for Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Study.

Khaled O Alameddine, Bradley A Richards, Krishna Vyas, Arif Chaudhry, Elena Millesi, Grant S Hamilton, Uldis Bite

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07689162 (Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Standard Bupivacaine for Post-Rhinoplasty Analgesia), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07689162 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Standard Bupivacaine for Post-Rhinoplasty Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2026 to 2027Enrolled45ConditionsPain, PostoperativeArmsStandard Bupivacaine, Liposomal Bupivacaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Khaled O AlameddineDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. khaledalamed5@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4644-7217
Bradley A RichardsDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Krishna VyasDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Arif ChaudhryDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Elena MillesiDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Grant S HamiltonDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Uldis BiteDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRhinoplasty, a leading cosmetic surgical procedure, often involves the use of opioids for postoperative pain management. This raises concerns due to potential opioid side effects and overprescription. Liposomal bupivacaine offers a promising alternative, but its efficacy in rhinoplasty remains under-investigated. This study assesses the impact of liposomal bupivacaine on postoperative pain and opioid consumption following rhinoplasty.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing rhinoplasty between January 2014 and September 2020. Postoperative pain scores were assessed at intervals up to 16 h, and opioid consumption was monitored. Patients were stratified into two groups: those receiving postoperative liposomal bupivacaine (Group 1) and those who did not (Group 2).

resultsNo significant disparities in demographics or surgical specifics were identified between groups. Group 1 consistently reported lower pain scores, notably at 30 min (1.4 vs. 3.7, p = 0.0006) and 2 h (2.2 vs. 3.38, p = 0.0417). Cumulatively, Group 1's average pain score was 2.4, significantly lower than Group 2's 3.4 (p = 0.0023). Group 1 also demonstrated reduced opioid consumption, with oxycodone and oral morphine equivalent (OME) intake being notably lower (p = 0.005 and p = 0.0428, respectively).

conclusionLiposomal bupivacaine presents as an efficacious alternative for post-rhinoplasty pain management, reducing both perceived pain and opioid consumption. While promising, the findings necessitate validation through larger, prospective studies considering the inherent limitations of this preliminary investigation. This study evaluates the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine as a pain management strategy in postoperative care for rhinoplasty and septorhinoplasty procedures, with the potential to reduce reliance on opioids. The findings indicate that patients receiving liposomal bupivacaine experienced significantly lower pain scores postoperatively and less overall opioid consumption, thereby enhancing patient comfort and safety. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineLiposomesPain ManagementPain MeasurementPostoperative PainRhinoplastyAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineLiposomesLiposomal bupivacaineOpioid reductionOpioid usePostoperative pain managementRhinoplastySeptorhinoplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.