Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37775288›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Implementing a package of essential non-communicable diseases interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review protocol.

Anju Vaidya, Padam Simkhada, Andrew Lee, Susan Jones, Ferdinand C Mukumbang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anju VaidyaSchool of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK Anju.vaidya@hud.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5631-1794
Padam SimkhadaSchool of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5706-6479
Andrew LeeSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9795-3793
Susan JonesHealth Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0883-4627
Ferdinand C MukumbangDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Huddersfield · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is increasing rapidly, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), accounting for 85% of premature deaths in the region. LMICs have been facing an increasing trend of a double burden of disease (infectious diseases and NCDs) that has led to multiple challenges in prioritising strategies for NCDs control amidst limited resources. Evidence indicates that measures such as the WHO's package of essential non-communicable (PEN) diseases interventions can prevent and control NCDs. However, because of the complexity of such health interventions, there is limited evidence that explains how the intervention works, for whom and in what context. We aim to unpack the causal mechanisms explaining how, why, for whom and in what context PEN prevents and controls NCDs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We propose a realist review to understand how, why, for whom and under what circumstances PEN works or does not work. The review process includes five steps applied iteratively throughout the study: clarification of review scope, searching for evidence, appraising and extracting data, synthesising evidence and drawing conclusions, and disseminating the findings. Programme theories will be developed using the realist logic for theory formulation-Retroductive Theorising. The context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) heuristic tool will be used to develop the programme theories. Portions of the reviewed documents describing constructs of context, mechanism and outcomes will be coded inductively and extracted. These extracted constructs will then be linked abductively to formulate CMO configurations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required for this review. Study findings will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and formal and informal reports.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesNoncommunicable DiseasesHumansResearch DesignReview Literature as Topiccoronary heart diseasehealth policyorganisation of health servicesprimary health carepublic healthpulmonary disease, chronic obstructive

Identifiers

PMID37775288
PMCPMC10546118
OpenAlexW4387190663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.