Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37775180›Full record

ReviewClinical medicine (London, England)2023

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and myocarditis.

Agata Katarzyna Sularz, Alina Hua, Tevfik Ismail

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Hearts and minds.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Agata Katarzyna SularzGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London UK.
Alina HuaGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London UK.
Tevfik IsmailKing's College London, London, UK, and reader, King's College London, UK tevfik.ismail@kcl.ac.uk.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of safe and effective vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was a major turning point in the fight against the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, pharmacovigilance has revealed a small but significant incidence of cardiac inflammation manifesting clinically as myocarditis or pericarditis, particularly in younger vaccine recipients. The incidence is the highest among men under age 40 within a week of receiving the second dose of the mRNA vaccine. In this review, we summarise the evidence for, and guidelines in relation to, SARS-CoV2 vaccine-related myocarditis.

Indexed as

COVID-19MyocarditisPericarditisAdultCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansMaleRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesRNA, ViralCOVID-19mRNA vaccinemyocarditisSARS-CoV-2 vaccine-related myocarditisvaccine safety

Identifiers

PMID37775180
PMCPMC10541288
OpenAlexW4387190739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.