Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37775110›Full record

ArticleFamily medicine and community health2023

Health centres and social determinants of health: an analysis of enabling services provision and clinical quality.

Michael Topmiller, Jessica McCann, Hank Hoang, Jennifer Rankin, Jene Grandmont, Molly Pelzer, Alek Sripipatana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family medicine and community health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael TopmillerHealthLandscape, American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, Kansas, USA mtopmiller@aafp.org.
Jessica McCannHealthLandscape, American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8821-0974
Hank HoangUS Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Primary Health Care, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Jennifer RankinHealthLandscape, American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, Kansas, USA.
Jene GrandmontHealthLandscape, American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, Kansas, USA.
Molly PelzerUS Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Primary Health Care, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Alek SripipatanaUS Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Primary Health Care, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIt is well known that social determinants of health (SDOH), including poverty, education, transportation and housing, are important predictors of health outcomes. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)-funded health centres serve a patient population with high vulnerability to barriers posed by SDOH and are required to provide services that enable health centre service utilisation and assist patients in navigating barriers to care. This study explores whether health centres with higher percentages of patients using these enabling services experience better clinical performance and outcomes. DESIGN AND

settingThe analysis uses organisational characteristics, patient demographics and clinical quality measures from HRSA's 2018 Uniform Data System. Health centres (n=875) were sorted into quartiles with quartile 1 (Q1) representing the lowest utilisation of enabling services and quartile 4 (Q4) representing the highest. The researchers calculated a service area social deprivation score weighted by the number of patients for each health centre and used ordinary least squares to create adjusted values for each of the clinical quality process and outcome measures. Analysis of variance was used to test differences across enabling services quartiles.

resultsAfter adjusting for patient characteristics, health centre size and social deprivation, authors found statistically significant differences for all clinical quality process measures across enabling services quartiles, with Q4 health centres performing significantly better than Q1 health centres for several clinical process measures. However, these Q4 health centres performed poorer in outcome measures, including blood pressure and haemoglobin A1c control.

conclusionThese findings emphasise the importance of how enabling services (eg, translation services, transportation) can address unmet social needs, improve utilisation of health services and reaffirm the challenges inherent in overcoming SDOH to improve health outcomes.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesSocial Determinants of HealthHealth ServicesHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePopulation Groupscommunity health centershealthcare disparitieshealth equityquality indicators, health caresocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID37775110
PMCPMC10546097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.